Assessing innovative care models for musculoskeletal disorders' management in the emergency department using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing
Gagnon, R.; Perreault, K.; Guertin, J. R.; Hebert, L. J.; Berthelot, S.
Show abstract
AbstractO_ST_ABSObjectivesC_ST_ABSCompare the average cost of an emergency department (ED) visit between three ED care models, namely management by an emergency physician (EP) alone (usual care), management by a primary contact physiotherapist (PT) and an EP (intervention), and management by a PT alone (sensitivity analysis). MethodsCost study (Canadian Public Payer perspective) based on data collected during a pragmatic randomized clinical trial (2018-2019) conducted in an urban Canadian academic ED (CHUL, Quebec City, Canada; n=78, 18-80 years old). Costs incurred for the management of persons presenting to the ED for a minor musculoskeletal disorder (MSKD) were calculated using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing, in which time invested with a patient determines care costs. The main outcome measure was the average cost of an ED visit. Generalized linear models with Gamma distributions and log links were used to assess whether there were significant differences in average costs between the care models. ResultsMean ED visit cost was $267.08 (2019 $CAD, 95%CI: $212.75, $346.40) for PT and EP management, compared with $245.14 for EP management ($169.46, $336.72), resulting in a non- significant absolute difference of 21.94 CAD/patient ($-87.33, $132.63) between models (p=.60). Sensitivity analyses showed that the average cost of ED management by a PT was $194.38 ($161.50, $234.34), representing a non-significant average saving of 50.76 CAD/patient ($- 156.91, $37.54) compared to EP management. ConclusionThis study is a first step towards a better understanding of the costs incurred by the Canadian Public Payer for the management of persons presenting with MSKDs in the ED. Primary contact physiotherapists have the potential to complement care of MSKD ED patients without increasing healthcare costs.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement Matters: Changing Penalty Calculations under the Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) Cost Hospitals Millions 92%
- Spatio-temporal modelling of referrals to outpatient respiratory clinics in the integrated care system of the Morecambe Bay area, England 92%
- Predictive accuracy of computer-aided versions of the on-admission National Early Warning Score in estimating the risk of COVID-19 for unplanned admission to hospital: a retrospective development and validation study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 93%
- Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with covid-19 assessed in Accident and Emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study 93%
- Impact on all-cause mortality of a case prediction and prevention intervention designed to reduce secondary care utilisation: findings from a randomised controlled trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Establishing consensus on emergency department interventions that could be conducted in sub-acute care settings for non-emergent paramedic transported visits: A RAND/UCLA modified Delphi study 95%
- Analyzing Supply and Demand on a General Internal Medicine Ward: A Cross-Sectional Study 94%
- Derivation And Validation Of A Clinical Score To Predict Death Among Non-Palliative COVID-19 Patients Presenting To Emergency Departments: The Ccedrrn COVID Mortality Score 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 95%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 93%
- Clinical prediction rule for SARS-CoV-2 infection from 116 U.S. emergency departments 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP): An Interpretable Machine Learning AutoScore–Derived Triage Tool for Predicting Mortality after Emergency Admissions 93%
- Out-of-Pocket Spending for COVID-19 Hospitalizations in 2020 92%
- Out-of-Pocket Spending for Health Care Within 90 Days of COVID-19 Hospitalization 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.