Back

Miniaturizing, Modifying, and Augmenting Nature's Proteins with Raygun

Devkota, K.; Shonai, D.; Mao, J.; Soderling, S. H.; Singh, R.

2024-08-16 bioinformatics Community evaluation
10.1101/2024.08.13.607858 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Proteins have evolved over billions of years through extensive and coordinated substitutions, insertions and deletions (indels). Computational protein design cannot yet fully mimic natures ability to engineer new proteins from existing templates. Protein language models generate informative per-residue representations, but leveraging them to execute large-scale, function-preserving mutations and indels has remained beyond reach. We introduce Raygun, a generative AI framework that unlocks efficient miniaturization, modification, and augmentation of proteins, using a novel probabilistic encoding of protein sequences constructed from language model embeddings. Emulating evolution, Raygun shrinks proteins by 10-25% (sometimes over 50%) while preserving predicted structural integrity and fidelity, introduces extensive sequence diversity while preserving functional sites, and can expand proteins beyond their natural size. These capabilities unlock new opportunities in gene therapy and biotechnology. In cell-based validation, Raygun successfully miniaturized fluorescent proteins, two of which are smaller than 96% of fluorescent proteins reported in FPbase, as well as TurboID, a synthetic biotin ligase widely adopted for proteomics. It also successfully expanded Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), a natural binding partner to the EGFR protein, generating EGF variants with higher binding affinity than the wildtype. Rayguns conceptual innovations in template-based protein design reveal that protein function can be encoded in a length-independent space. This fundamental insight bridges protein representation learning with evolutionary biology and could unlock the development of more efficient molecular tools and biological therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.