Fast and Accurate LSTM Meta-modeling of TNF-induced Tumor Resistance In Vitro
Abrate, M. P.; Smeriglio, R.; Bardini, R.; Savino, A.; Di Carlo, S.
Show abstract
Multi-level, hybrid models and simulations, among other methods, are essential to enable predictions and hypothesis generation in systems biology research. However, the computational complexity of these models poses a bottleneck, limiting the applicability of methodologies relying on large number of simulations, such as the Optimization via Simulation (OvS) of complex biological processes. Meta-models based on approximate surrogate models simplify multi-level simulations, maintaining accuracy while reducing computational costs. Among Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks are well suited to handle sequential data, which often characterizes biological simulations. This paper presents an LSTM-based surrogate modeling approach for multi-level simulations of complex biological processes. Validation relies on the simulation of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) administration to a 3T3 mouse fibroblasts tumor spheroid based on PhysiBoSS 2.0, a hybrid agent-based multi-level modeling framework. Results show that the proposed LSTM meta-model is accurate and fast compared with the simulator. In fact, it infers simulated behavior with an average relative error of 7.5%. Moreover, it is at least five orders of magnitude faster. Even considering the cost of training, this approach provides a faster, more accurate, and reusable surrogate of multi-scale simulations in computationally complex tasks, such as model-based OvS of biological processes.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptive time scales in recurrent neural networks 95%
- A novel interpretable deep transfer learning combining diverse learnable parameters for improved T2D prediction based on single-cell gene regulatory networks 95%
- Reinforcement learning derived chemotherapeutic schedules for robust patient-specific therapy 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.