Predictive Modeling of Novel Somatic Mutation Impacts on Cancer Prognosis: A Machine Learning Approach Using the COSMIC Database
Mansoor, M. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundSomatic mutations play a crucial role in cancer initiation, progression, and treatment response. While high-throughput sequencing has vastly expanded our understanding of cancer genomics, interpreting the functional impact of novel somatic mutations remains challenging. Machine learning approaches show promise in predicting mutation impacts, but robust models for accurate prognosis across different cancer types are still needed. ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model using the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database to predict the functional impact of novel somatic mutations on cancer prognosis across various cancer types. MethodsWe extracted data on 6,573,214 coding point mutations across 1,391 cancer types from COSMIC v95. We engineered 47 features for each mutation, including sequence context, protein domain information, evolutionary conservation scores, and frequency data. We developed and compared Random Forest, XGBoost, and Deep Neural Network models, selecting XGBoost based on performance. The model was evaluated using standard metrics and externally validated using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). ResultsThe XGBoost model achieved an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.89 on the test set and 0.86 on the TCGA validation set. The model demonstrated consistent performance across major cancer types (AUC-ROC range: 0.85-0.92). Key predictive features included evolutionary conservation score, protein domain disruption, and mutation frequency. The model correctly identified 87% of known driver mutations and predicted 3,241 potentially high-impact novel mutations. Model predictions significantly correlated with patient survival in the TCGA dataset (HR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.6-2.0, p < 0.001). ConclusionsOur machine learning model shows strong predictive power in assessing the functional impact of somatic mutations on cancer prognosis across various cancer types. This approach has potential applications in research prioritization and clinical decision support, contributing to the advancement of precision oncology.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Added-value of whole exome and RNA Sequencing in advanced and refractory cancer patients with no molecular-based treatment recommendation based on a 90-gene panel 91%
- Comprehensive analysis of potential immunotherapy genomic biomarkers in 1,000 Chinese patients with cancer 91%
- Combination of hotspot mutations with methylation and fragmentomic profiles to enhance Multi-Cancer Early Detection 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Substantial Batch Effects in TCGA Exome Sequences Undermine Pan-Cancer Analysis of Germline Variants 92%
- Gene networks and expression quantitative trait loci associated with platinum-based chemotherapy response in high-grade serous ovarian cancer 91%
- The role of KPNA2 mutations in breast cancer prognosis: A survey of publicly available databases 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel ratio-metric features enable the identification of new driver genes across cancer types 95%
- CANCERSIGN: a user-friendly and robust tool for identification and classification of mutational signatures and patterns in cancer genomes 94%
- Genome-wide investigation of gene-cancer associations for the prediction of novel therapeutic targets in oncology 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.