Explainable AI in Healthcare: Systematic Review of Clinical Decision Support Systems
Aziz, N. A.; Manzoor, A.; Mazhar Qureshi, M. D.; Qureshi, M. A.; Rashwan, W.
Show abstract
This overview investigates the evolution and current landscape of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in healthcare, highlighting its implications for researchers, technology developers, and policymakers. Following the PRISMA protocol, we analysed 89 publications from January 2000 to June 2024, spanning 19 medical domains, with a focus on Neurology and Cancer as the most studied areas. Various data types are reviewed, including tabular data, medical imaging, and clinical text, offering a comprehensive perspective on XAI applications. Key findings identify significant gaps, such as the limited availability of public datasets, suboptimal data preprocessing techniques, insufficient feature selection and engineering, and the limited utilisation of multiple XAI methods. Additionally, the lack of standardised XAI evaluation metrics and practical obstacles in integrating XAI systems into clinical workflows are emphasised. We provide actionable recommendations, including the design of explainability-centric models, the application of diverse and multiple XAI methods, and the fostering of interdisciplinary collaboration. These strategies aim to guide researchers in building robust AI models, assist technology developers in creating intuitive and user-friendly AI tools, and inform policymakers in establishing effective regulations. Addressing these gaps will promote the development of transparent, reliable, and user-centred AI systems in healthcare, ultimately improving decision-making and patient outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 97%
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 95%
- Evaluating and mitigating unfairness in multimodal remote mental health assessments 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 96%
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 96%
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of unstructured text in prognostic clinical prediction models: a systematic review 95%
- Empowering Personalized Pharmacogenomics with Generative AI Solutions 95%
- Automated stratification of trauma injury severity across multiple body regions using multi-modal, multi-class machine learning models 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-MET: A Deep Learning-based Clinical Decision Support System for Distinguishing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children from Endemic Typhus 95%
- Identification of Myocardial Infarction (MI) Probability from Imbalanced Medical Survey Data: An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with Explainable AI (XAI) Insights 95%
- Improving irregular temporal modeling by integrating synthetic data to the electronic medical record using conditional GANs: a case study of fluid overload prediction in the intensive care unit 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.