Checklist to Support the Development and Implementation of AI in Clinical Settings
OWOYEMI, A.; Osuchukwu, J.; Salwei, M.; Boyd, A.
Show abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare settings demands a nuanced approach that considers both technical performance and sociotechnical factors. Recognizing this, our study introduces the Clinical AI Sociotechnical Framework (CASoF), developed through literature synthesis, and refined via a Modified Delphi study involving global healthcare professionals. Our research identifies a critical gap in existing frameworks, which largely focus on either technical specifications or trial outcomes, neglecting the comprehensive sociotechnical dynamics essential for successful AI deployment in clinical environments. CASoF addresses this gap by providing a structured checklist that guides the planning, design, development, and implementation stages of AI systems in healthcare. The checklist emphasizes the importance of considering the value proposition, data integrity, human-AI interaction, technical architecture, organizational culture, and ongoing support and monitoring, ensuring that AI tools are not only technologically sound but also practically viable and socially adaptable within clinical settings. Our findings suggest that the successful integration of AI in healthcare depends on a balanced focus on both technological advancements and the socio-technical environment of clinical settings. CASoF represents a step forward in bridging this divide, offering a holistic approach to AI deployment that is mindful of the complexities of healthcare systems. The checklist aims to facilitate the development of AI tools that are effective, userfriendly, and seamlessly integrated into clinical workflows, ultimately enhancing patient care and healthcare outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 95%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 95%
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 96%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 95%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 94%
- A Scoping Review Protocol on Integration of mobile-linked POC diagnostics in community-based healthcare: User Experience 94%
- Protocol For Human Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Clinical Consultations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 95%
- Telemedicine Ready or Not? a cross-sectional assessment of telemedicine maturity of federally funded tertiary health institutions in Nigeria 93%
- The experiences of 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams during the first year of the pandemic in the WHO European Region: a qualitative study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.