Virtual dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI using 2D U-Net Architectures.
Schreiter, H.; Eberle, J.; Kapsner, L. A.; Hadler, D.; Ohlmeyer, S.; Erber, R.; Emons, J.; Laun, F. B.; Uder, M.; Wenkel, E.; Bickelhaupt, S.; Liebert, A.
Show abstract
Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examinations routinely include contrast-agent based dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) acquisitions. Expanding the accessibility and personalization of breast MRI might be supported amongst others by advancing non-contrast-enhanced MRI, such as virtual dynamic contrast-enhanced techniques (vDCE) utilizing neural networks. This IRB-approved retrospective study includes n=540 breast MRI examinations acquired on a single 3T MRI scanner. Two 2D U-Net architectures were trained using non-contrast-enhanced MRI acquisitions including T1w, T2w and multi-b-value diffusion weighted imaging acquisitions as inputs and either a single (SCO-Net) or multiple (MCO-Net) time points of a DCE series as ground truth. The neural networks predicted a vDCE series corresponding to five consecutive DCE time points. Across all time points, no significant differences in structural similarity index (SSIM) could be found between the SCO-Net and MCO-Net, both achieving a mean SSIM of 0.86. For peak-signal-to-noise-ratio and normalized root-mean-square error, significantly better results could be observed for the MCO-Net reaching scores of 24.42dB and 0.087 respectively. Comparison of manual segmentations of findings on DCE and vDCE images reached a DICE score of 0.61 and an intersection over union (IoU) of 0.47 without significant differences between SCO-Net and MCO-Net. These findings suggest a technical feasibility of generating vDCE image series from unenhanced input acquisitions using neural networks. However, the analysis does not allow drawing any conclusion on the clinical assessment of lesion specific curve kinetics, which need to be assessed prior determining on the feasibility of deriving diagnostically meaningful enhancement characteristics in individual lesions.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fibre tracing in biomedical images: An objective comparison between seven algorithms 96%
- Enhancing Breast Ultrasound Segmentation through Fine-tuning and Optimization Techniques: Sharp Attention UNet 95%
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Segmentation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and surrounding vessels in CT images using deep convolutional neural networks and Texture Descriptors 95%
- Radius-Optimized Efficient Template Matching for Lesion Detection from Brain Images 94%
- Developing a Fully Automated Imaging Biomarker for HCC Risk Assessment via MRI-Based Tumor Segmentation and EPM 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 96%
- SCU-Net: A deep learning method for segmentation and quantification of breast arterial calcifications on mammograms 95%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Frequency and Phase Correction of GABA-Edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy using Complex-Valued Convolutional Neural Networks 94%
- Anisotropy Measure from Three Diffusion-Encoding Gradient Directions 94%
- Simulated Diagnostic Performance of Ultra-Low-Field MRI: Harnessing Open-Access Datasets to Evaluate Novel Devices 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 95%
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 92%
- An Explainable Web-Based Diagnostic System for Alzheimer's Disease Using XRAI and Deep Learning on Brain MRI 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.