Cost effectiveness of adopting a postoperative delirium risk prediction tool with non-pharmacological delirium prevention interventions for surgical patients.
graves, n.; Boettger, S.; zozman, m.; Franziska, M.; Stocker, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundPostoperative delirium arises among older surgical patients. Screening followed by prevention efforts are recommended. A risk prediction tool has been developed yet the performance and whether adoption is cost-effective are unknown. ObjectiveTo estimate the expected change to total costs and health benefits measured by quality adjusted life years from a decision to adopt PIPRA plus for screening purpose to find at-risk individuals who are then offered non-pharmacological interventions to reduce risks of postoperative delirium. DesignCost effectiveness modelling study that draws on a range of relevant data sources. SettingSwiss healthcare system. SubjectsSurgical inpatients aged 60 or older, excluding cardiac and intracranial surgeries. MethodsA decision tree model was used to capture the events likely to impact on cost and health outcomes. Information was harvested from a prospective before-after study and augmented with other relevant data sources. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was undertaken to reveal the probability that adoption was cost effective against a stated maximum willingness to pay threshold for decision making in Switzerland. ResultsPatients in both phases of the study were similar. Costs were lower by 3075CHF (SD 997) per patient with the adoption of the risk screening tool and there was a modest gain to health benefits of 0.01 QALY (SD 0.026). There was a 100% probability that adoption would be cost saving and a 91% probability that adoption would be cost-effective. ConclusionsWe provide early-stage evidence that a decision to adopt the risk screening tool and offer risk reducing interventions will be cost-effective. Key pointsMany surgical patients suffer from post operative delirium. Screening and early intervention can reduce risks and improve outcomes. It is important to establish whether screening and early intervention is cost effective.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 93%
- Probabilistic analysis of COVID-19 patients' individual length of stay in Swiss intensive care units 93%
- A model framework for projecting the prevalence and impact of Long-COVID in the UK 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of intensive care for hospitalized Covid-19 patients: experience from South Africa 92%
- Cost-effectiveness of whole area testing of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in Merthyr Tydfil, 2020: A Modelling and economic analysis 91%
- Measurement Matters: Changing Penalty Calculations under the Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) Cost Hospitals Millions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating the RISE UP score for predicting prognosis in patients with COVID-19 in the emergency department, a retrospective study 92%
- Which factors should be included in triage? An online survey of the attitudes of the UK general public to pandemic triage dilemmas 92%
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The roadmap for implementing value based healthcare in European university hospitals - consensus report and recommendations 89%
- Quality-adjusted life expectancy norms for the English population 88%
- New IPECAD open-source model framework for the health technology assessment of early Alzheimer’s disease treatment: development and use cases 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Real-World Mobility Recovery after Hip Fracture using Digital Mobility Outcomes 91%
- The consistent burden in published estimates of delirium occurrence in medical inpatients over four decades: a systematic review and meta-analysis study 91%
- COVID-19 risk factors amongst 14,786 care home residents: An observational longitudinal analysis including daily community positive test rates of COVID-19, hospital stays, and vaccination status in Wales (UK) between 1st September 2020 and 1st May 2021. 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.