A Mobile Intervention to Reduce Anxiety Among University Students, Faculty, and Staff: Mixed Methods Study on Users Experiences
Livermon, S.; Michel, A.; Zhang, Y.; Petz, K.; Toner, E.; Rucker, M.; Boukhechba, M.; Barnes, L. E.; Teachman, B. A.
Show abstract
Anxiety is highly prevalent among college communities, with significant numbers of students, faculty, and staff experiencing severe anxiety symptoms. Despite this high prevalence, many individuals remain untreated due to barriers such as time, stigma, waitlists, and cost of services. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), including Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation (CBM-I), offer promising solutions to enhance access to mental health care, yet there is a critical need to evaluate user experience and acceptability of DMHIs. This study used a mixed methods approach to gather feedback from users of the first trial of a mobile application called "Hoos Think Calmly" (HTC), which offers brief CBM-I training to reduce negative interpretations and increase flexible thinking in response to stressors commonly experienced by students, faculty, and staff at a large public university. Following the parent trial (https://osf.io/36grh/) qualitative data was collected through semi-structured interviews from a subset of participants (n=22). Thematic analysis revealed five main themes: Effectiveness of the Training Program; Feedback on Training Sessions; Barriers to Using the App; Use Patterns; and Suggestions for Improvement. Feedback highlighted the importance of greater content relatability and personalization, while also identifying forgetfulness and not understanding the intervention format or rationale as barriers to using the program. Participants tended to use the program at routine or scheduled times rather than during specific moments of stress or anxiety and relied heavily on the apps notification system. Suggestions for improvement focused on incorporating progress tracking, offering greater customization options, and integrating more diverse training content. Additionally, biweekly user experience questionnaires sent to all participants in the active treatment condition (n=134) during the parent trial showed most participants reported the program to be slightly to somewhat helpful in reducing or managing their anxiety or stress. Findings highlight the importance of understanding users experience and iterative DMHI development. Author SummaryEffective digital mental health interventions can help address the high levels of reported anxiety in college communities. These interventions can be used to reduce the barriers to accessing mental health services and promote flexible thinking to reduce the harmful impacts of anxiety. Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of various DMHIs, their impact is often hindered by high attrition rates alongside low engagement. In this study, we gathered mixed-methods feedback data on a new DMHI called Hoos Think Calmly to assess individual user experiences that may impact engagement. Our goal is to better understand participants evaluation of HTC and to gather feedback on how to enhance acceptability of the program in future iterations. Data was collected through feedback interviews and user experience questionnaires. We found that participants perceived HTC to be somewhat effective at reducing or managing their anxiety, but also noted barriers to ongoing use. Our study provides helpful insights into app use patterns, barriers to engagement, and general suggestions for improving DMHIs.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 96%
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 95%
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 97%
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 96%
- Evaluating the Clinical Feasibility of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Clinical Decision Support System: A Longitudinal Feasibility Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 94%
- Perceptions on undertaking regular asymptomatic self-testing for COVID-19 using lateral flow tests: A qualitative study of university students and staff 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 95%
- Remote working in mental health services: a rapid umbrella review of pre-COVID-19 literature 93%
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of Goal Management Training + (GMT + ) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Through Collaborative Design: A Process Description 95%
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 93%
- Co-development of a best practice checklist for mental health data science: A Delphi study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.