Physiological and Molecular Responses of Projected Future Temperatures on Potato Tuberization
Guillemette, A.; Hernandez Casanova, G.; Hamilton, J. P.; Pokorna, E.; Dobrev, P. I.; Motyka, V.; Rashotte, A. M.; Leisner, C.
Show abstract
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is one of the most important food crops globally and is especially vulnerable to heat stress. Significant knowledge gaps remain however, in our understanding of the developmental mechanisms associated with tuber responses to heat stress. This study uses whole-plant physiology, transcriptomics, and hormone profiling to gain insights into the mechanisms associated with heat stress impacts on potato tuber development. When plants were grown in projected future temperature conditions, levels of abscisic acid (ABA) were significantly decreased in leaf and tuber tissues while rates of leaf carbon assimilation and stomatal conductance were not significantly affected. While plants grown in elevated temperature conditions initiated more tubers on average per plant, there was a significant decrease (66%) in mature tubers at final harvest. We hypothesize that reduced tuber yields at elevated temperatures are not due to reductions in tuber initiation, but due to impaired tuber filling. Transcriptomic analysis found significant changes in transcript expression for genes related to response to ABA, heat and auxin biosynthetic process. The known tuberization repressor genes SELF PRUNING 5G (StSP5G) and CONSTANS-LIKE1 (StCOL1) were found to be differentially expressed in tubers grown in elevated temperatures. IDENTITY OF TUBER 1 (StIT1) and TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 (StTOC1) are other known tuberization genes that displayed distinct expression patterns in elevated versus ambient temperatures but were not differentially expressed. This work highlights potential gene targets and key developmental stages associated with tuberization to development more heat tolerant potatoes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tomato drought-responsive transcription factor TINY1 suppresses embryonic growth 96%
- Mutations in the tomato gibberellin receptors suppresses xylem proliferation and reduces water loss under water-deficit conditions 95%
- Ppd-H1 integrates drought stress signals to control spike development and flowering time in barley 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential transpiration between pods and leaves during stress combination in soybean 96%
- Paralog editing tunes rice stomatal density to maintain photosynthesis and improve drought tolerance 96%
- The tomato DELLA protein PROCERA promotes ABA responses in guard cells by upregulating ABA transporter 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Constitutive expression of JASMONATE RESISTANT 1 elevates content of several jasmonates and primes Arabidopsis thaliana to better withstand drought 96%
- Welcome pathogens: transient heat dampens immune responses to acibenzolar-S-methyl in apple plants 95%
- Loss of PIF7 attenuates shade and elevated temperature responses throughout the lifecycle in Pennycress 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- An allelic resolution gene atlas for tetraploid potato provides insights into tuberization and stress resilience 97%
- The transcriptome of soybean reproductive tissues subjected to water deficit, heat stress, and a combination of water deficit and heat stress. 96%
- Heating quinoa shoots results in yield loss by inhibiting fruit production and delaying maturity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The MYB33, MYB65, and MYB101 transcription factors affect Arabidopsis and potatoresponses to drought by regulating the ABA signaling pathway 96%
- Changes in SWEET-mediated sugar partitioning affect photosynthesis performance and plant response to drought 96%
- The impact of water deficit and heat stress combination on the molecular response, physiology and seed production of soybean 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.