Back

Medications that Regulate Gastrointestinal Transit Influence Inpatient Blood Glucose

Momenzadeh, A.; Cranney, C. W.; Choi, S. Y.; Bresee, C.; Tighiouart, M.; Gianchandani, R.; Pevnick, J.; Moore, J.; Meyer, J.

2024-08-02 health informatics
10.1101/2024.07.31.24311287 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveA multitude of factors affect a hospitalized individuals blood glucose (BG), making BG difficult to predict and manage. Beyond medications well established to alter BG, such as beta-blockers, there are likely many medications with undiscovered effects on BG variability. Identification of these medications and the strength and timing of these relationships has potential to improve glycemic management and patient safety. Materials and MethodsEHR data from 103,871 inpatient encounters over 8 years within a large, urban health system was used to extract over 500 medications, laboratory measurements, and clinical predictors of BG. Feature selection was performed using an optimized Lasso model with repeated 5-fold cross-validation on the 80% training set, followed by a linear mixed regression model to evaluate statistical significance. Significant medication predictors were then evaluated for novelty against a comprehensive adverse drug event database. ResultsWe found 29 statistically significant features associated with BG; 24 were medications including 10 medications not previously documented to alter BG. The remaining five factors were Black/African American race, history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, prior BG (mean and last) and creatinine. DiscussionThe unexpected medications, including several agents involved in gastrointestinal motility, found to affect BG were supported by available studies. This study may bring to light medications to use with caution in individuals with hyper- or hypoglycemia. Further investigation of these potential candidates is needed to enhance clinical utility of these findings. ConclusionThis study uniquely identifies medications involved in gastrointestinal transit to be predictors of BG that may not well established and recognized in clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.6%
2
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.1%
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
6
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
8
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
9
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
11
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
14
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
16
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
18
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
21
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%