Back

Derivation of aerial insect concentration with a 94 GHz FMCW cloud radar

Lochmann, M.; Kalesse-Los, H.; Haest, B.; Vogl, T.; van Klink, R.; Addison, F.; Maahn, M.; Schimmel, W.; Wirth, C.; Quaas, J.

2024-07-30 ecology
10.1101/2024.07.30.605781 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Aerial insects are vital for nature and society. Though methods to observe flying insects have consistently improved in the last decades, insects remain difficult to monitor systematically and consistently over large spatial and temporal scales. Remote sensing with radars has proved to be one of the more effective tools for observation. However, as radars are most sensitive to targets similar in size to the radar wavelength, the detectable sub-group of aerial insects of a certain size range depends on the employed radar. Here, we present a novel method based on data of a zenith-pointing W-band (94 GHz,{lambda} = 0.32 cm) Doppler cloud radar to estimate insect concentration in a vertical profile. Multiple meteorological state-of-the-art algorithms are combined to extract insect signals from the radar data and quantify their abundance from 50 m to 1000 m above the ground. For evaluation, this method is applied to Doppler cloud radar data from a summertime 30 day observation period in central Germany. Results are compared to data from an X-band (9.4 GHz,{lambda} = 3.2 cm) radar in the same region. Aerial insect concentration derived from the W-band radar, which is sensitive to insects in the mm size range, is substantially higher than from the X-band radar, detecting insects in the cm size range. In addition, diel flight timings vary between the different sub-groups of aerial insects observed by the two radar instruments. With its superior sensitivity to smaller insects like aphids, the proposed methodology complements existing entomological radar techniques and contributes to achieving a more complete description of aerial insect activity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.4%
2
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
6
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
8
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
9
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
14
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
16
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
18
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
21
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
26
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%