Perspective on Harnessing Large Language Models to Uncover Insights in Diabetes Wearable Data
Alavi, A.; Cha, K.; Esfarjani, D. P.; Patel, B.; Than, J. L. P.; Lee, A. Y.; Nebeker, C.; Snyder, M.; Bahmani, A.
Show abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant attention and are increasingly used by researchers. Concurrently, publicly accessible datasets containing individual-level health information are becoming more available. Some of these datasets, such as the recently released Artificial Intelligence Ready and Equitable Atlas for Diabetes Insights (AI-READI) dataset, include individual-level data from digital wearable technologies. The application of LLMs to gain insights about health from wearable sensor data specific to diabetes is underexplored. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of multiple LLMs, including GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT-4o, Gemini, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Claude 3 Sonnet, on various diabetes research tasks using diverse prompting methods to evaluate their performance and gain new insights into diabetes and glucose dysregulation. Notably, GPT-4o showed promising performance across tasks with a chain-of-thought prompt design (aggregate performance score of 95.5%). Moreover, using this model, we identified new insights from the dataset, such as the heightened sensitivity to stress among diabetic participants during glucose level fluctuations, which underscores the complex interplay between metabolic and psychological factors. These results demonstrate that LLMs can enhance the pace of discovery and also enable automated interpretation of data for users of wearable devices, including both the research team and the individual wearing the device. Meanwhile, we also emphasize the critical limitations, such as privacy and ethical risks and dataset biases, that must be resolved for real-world application in diabetes health settings. This study highlights the potential and challenges of integrating LLMs into diabetes research and, more broadly, wearables, paving the way for future healthcare advancements, particularly in disadvantaged communities.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 94%
- Evaluating and mitigating unfairness in multimodal remote mental health assessments 93%
- Automated Image Transcription for Perinatal Blood Pressure Monitoring Using Mobile Health Technology 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model Integrated with the Clinical Workflow for Inpatient Discharge Date Prediction 92%
- Listening to mental health crisis needs at scale: using Natural Language Processing to understand and evaluate a mental health crisis text messaging service 91%
- Large Language Models in Real-World Clinical Workflows: A Systematic Review of Applications and Implementation 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A scoping review of fair machine learning techniques when using real-world data 94%
- Mining for Equitable Health: Assessing the Impact of Missing Data in Electronic Health Records 93%
- A methodology of phenotyping ICU patients from EHR data: high-fidelity, personalized, and interpretable phenotypes estimation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of Medical Concept Embedding for Feature Engineering in Phenotyping 94%
- Characterizing subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotype algorithms within older adults: A case study for dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases 92%
- A Study of Calibration as a Measurement of Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in Biomedical Research 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.