Mind the Gap: Unraveling Mental Health Disparities in America's Diverse Landscape
Fischer, M.; Swint, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, X.
Show abstract
BackgroundMental health disparities persist as a significant public health concern in the United States, with certain populations experiencing disproportionate burdens of mental illness and barriers to care. This systematic review aims to synthesize current evidence on mental health disparities across various demographic groups and identify key factors contributing to these inequities. MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of peer-reviewed literature published between 2010 and 2024 using PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases. Studies examining mental health outcomes, access to care, and treatment efficacy across racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, gender, sexual orientation, and geographic groups in the US were included. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed study quality. ResultsOf 2,345 initially identified studies, 127 met inclusion criteria. Consistent disparities were observed across multiple domains, with racial/ethnic minorities, low-income individuals, LGBTQ+ populations, and rural residents experiencing higher rates of mental health disorders, lower access to quality care, and poorer treatment outcomes. Key contributing factors included systemic racism, socioeconomic barriers, stigma, lack of culturally competent care, and inadequate insurance coverage. ConclusionThis review highlights persistent and multifaceted mental health disparities in the US. Addressing these inequities requires comprehensive policy interventions, increased funding for community-based mental health services, improved cultural competence in healthcare delivery, and targeted research to develop effective, culturally-tailored interventions for underserved populations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed methods analysis of youth mental health intervention feasibility and acceptability in a North American city: perspectives from Seattle, Washington 96%
- Gender-affirming care, mental health, and economic stability in the time of COVID-19: a global cross-sectional study of transgender and non-binary people 95%
- Psychotherapies and Psychological Support for Individuals Facing Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health problems in the general population during and after the first lockdown phase due to the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic: Rapid review of multi-wave studies 95%
- The treatment gap for mental disorders in adults enrolled in HIV treatment programs in South Africa: A cohort study using linked electronic health records 95%
- Uncovering Survivorship Bias in Longitudinal Mental Health Surveys 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health services implementation in Colombia – a systematic review 95%
- Awareness, utility and preferences of campus-based mental health services at tertiary institutions in Harare Zimbabwe: a cross-sectional study. 94%
- Intimate partner violence and its correlates in middle-aged and older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country secondary analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common Practices for Sociodemographic Data Reporting in Digital Mental Health Intervention Research: A Scoping Review 96%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 95%
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The gender gap in adolescent mental health: a cross-national investigation of 566,827 adolescents across 73 countries 91%
- Financial Hardship and Social Assistance as Determinants of Mental Health and Food and Housing Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic 90%
- How does the local area deprivation influence life chances for children in poverty in Wales: A record linkage cohort study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.