Revamping the Day Hospital Program at North York General Hospital in response to COVID-related changes in patient demographics
Zhou, C.; Doval, I.; Liu, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe Dynamic Sustainability Framework emphasizes the need for improving programs after implementation in response to the evolving environment. This report illustrates said framework and describes significant changes made to the Psychiatric Day Hospital (DH) at North York General Hospital (NYGH) in response to pandemic-related changes in participant demographic. Patient and staff satisfaction pre- and post-program modification are compared. ProblemThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in increased DH referral acuity and patient affect dysregulation. The program needed to adapt to these changes and better serve the new DH patient population. MethodsDH participants and team member feedback was gathered. Five major areas of improvement were identified. Changes were systematically introduced from July 2021 to January 2022. Feedback post-implementation in 2022-2023 from patients and DH team members were gathered for comparison. InterventionsDialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) was adopted as the theoretical basis of the revamped Day Hospital Program. All Day Hospital staff underwent training in DBT skills, with the creation of new treatment schedules and materials. Two separate streams were created for differing patient illness severity. The program continued to run during implementation of new changes, without disruption to the existing clinical workload. ResultsThe program transitioned from a 3-week psychoeducational and rudimentary CBT program to a dual-stream 4-week DBT-based program to address patient acuity and higher prevalence of emotional dysregulation. Quantitative and qualitative feedback from new program participants have been positive. ConclusionsThe Day Hospital Program at NYGH made a successful transition in response to an evolving healthcare landscape.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 97%
- A scoping review of trauma informed approaches in acute, crisis, emergency and residential mental health care 95%
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 97%
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 95%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 95%
- The Benefits and Harms of Open Notes in Mental Health: A Delphi Survey of International Experts 94%
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of Goal Management Training + (GMT + ) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Through Collaborative Design: A Process Description 94%
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 94%
- Applications of Large Language Models in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subjective mental health and need for care among psychiatric outpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an outreach initiative in Sweden 92%
- Ethnic differences in receipt of psychological interventions in Early Intervention in Psychosis services in England: a cross-sectional study 91%
- An overview of current mental health in the general population of Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the COLLATE project 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.