Back

In-vitro Metabolite Identification for MEDI7219, an Oral GLP-1 Peptide, using LC-MS/MS with CID and EAD Fragmentation

Liu, K.; Huang, Y.; Wang, T.; Mu, R.; Rosenbaum, A. I.

2024-07-27 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2024.07.26.605352 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Oral peptide therapeutics typically suffer from short half-lives as they are readily degraded by digestive enzymes. Systematic peptide engineering along with formulation optimization led to the development of a clinical candidate MEDI7219, an orally-bioavailable GLP-1 peptide, that is much more stable than wild type GLP-1 or semaglutide. In this study, we elucidated peptide biotransformation products using in vitro pancreatin assay that employed both collision-induced dissociation (CID) and electron-activated dissociation (EAD) LC-MS/MS methods. Using this approach, we have confidently identified a total of 13 metabolites. Relative quantification of these metabolites over time showed sequential cleavage pattern as peptides were further digested to smaller fragments. These 13 metabolites mapped to 8 cleavage sites on MEDI7219 structure. Most of these cleavage sites can be explained by the specificity of digestive enzymes, e.g. ,trypsin, pepsin and elastase. -methyl-L-phenylalanine appeared to be well protected from chymotrypsin and pepsin digestion since no cleavage peptides ending with -methyl-L-phenylalanine were observed. These study results expand upon previously published stability data and provide new insights on potential GLP1 proteolytic liabilities for future engineering. Furthermore, this study exemplifies the application of pancreatin in vitro system methodology as a valuable tool for understanding metabolism of oral peptide therapeutics in vitro. Additionally, orthogonal MS fragmentation modes offered improved confidence in identification for peptide unknown metabolites. Significance StatementIn vitro metabolite identification of oral GLP1 peptide that uncovers potential proteolytic hotspots that can inform future oral peptide engineering.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
3
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.7%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
6
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
7
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
14
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
17
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
24
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%