Back

Individualized melanoma risk prediction using machine learning with electronic health records

Wan, G.; Khattab, S.; Roster, K.; Nguyen, N.; Yan, B.; Rashdan, H.; Estiri, H.; Semenov, Y. R.

2024-07-27 dermatology
10.1101/2024.07.26.24311080 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMelanoma is a lethal form of skin cancer with a high propensity for metastasizing, making early detection crucial. This study aims to develop a machine learning model using electronic health record data to identify patients at high risk of developing melanoma to prioritize them for dermatology screening. MethodsThis retrospective study included patients diagnosed with melanoma (cases), as well as matched patients without melanoma (controls), from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Brigham and Womens Hospital (BWH), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), and other hospital centers within the Research Patient Data Registry at Mass General Brigham healthcare system between 1992 and 2022. Patient demographics, family history, diagnoses, medications, procedures, laboratory tests, reasons for visits, and allergy data six months prior to the date of first melanoma diagnosis or date of censoring were extracted. A machine learning framework for health outcomes (MLHO) was utilized to build the model. Performance was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation of the MGH cohort (internal validation) and by using the MGH cohort for model training and the non-MGH cohort for independent testing (external validation). The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC) and the Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUC-PR), along with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs), were computed. ResultsThis study identified 10,778 patients with melanoma and 10,778 matched patients without melanoma, including 8,944 from MGH and 1,834 from non-MGH hospitals in each cohort, both with an average follow-up duration of 9 years. In the internal and external validations, the model achieved AUC-ROC values of 0.826 (95% CI: 0.819-0.832) and 0.823 (95% CI: 0.809-0.837) and AUC-PR scores of 0.841 (95% CI: 0.834-0.848) and 0.822 (95% CI: 0.806-0.839), respectively. Important risk features included a family history of melanoma, a family history of skin cancer, and a prior diagnosis of benign neoplasm of skin. Conversely, medical examination without abnormal findings was identified as a protective feature. ConclusionsMachine learning techniques and electronic health records can be effectively used to predict melanoma risk, potentially aiding in identifying high-risk patients and enabling individualized screening strategies for melanoma.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.6%
2
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.5%
6
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.4%
8
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
12
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
13
JID Innovations
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
17
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
19
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
British Journal of Dermatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
30
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%