Using the Emergency Care Data Set for the epidemiological surveillance of Children and Young People aged less than 18 years: a case study of COVID-19 in England 2020-2023
Boateng, J.; Oeser, C.; Seghezzo, G.; Harman, K.; Dabrera, G.; Webster, H.; Hope, R.; Thelwall, S.; Lamagni, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe Emergency Care Data Set provides insight into emergency care activity in England, and combined with COVID-19 surveillance data, can provide new insights into acute COVID-19 infection. MethodsThis study identified individuals <18 years old who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between February 2020 and March 2023 and attended emergency care 1-14 days after a positive test. The studys main objective was to explore ED attendance outcomes by demographic characteristics. ResultsThere were significant differences (p < 0.05) across most of the characteristics of <18s admitted to hospital from emergency departments, and those who were discharged from ED. <18s in IMD decile 1 (14.9%) made up the highest proportion of admissions, with those in less deprived areas having a greater proportion of individuals discharged from ED. February to August 2020 (1.5%) and September 2022 to March 2023 (2.8%) saw the highest proportion of <18 cases attending ED, though the highest number of cases were seen between September 2021 and February 2022. ConclusionsThere is great value in the use of ECDS. It facilitates quick, regular insights into the health outcomes of key demographics, and provides a window into the health-seeking behaviours of individuals. Furthermore, outcomes of emergency care attendance can potentially inform assessments of infection severity across multiple demographics during outbreaks and pandemics.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of severe outcomes among Omicron sub-lineages BA.4.6, BA.2.75 and BQ.1 compared to BA.5 in England 94%
- Protective effect of a first SARS-CoV-2 infection from reinfection: a matched retrospective cohort study using PCR testing data in England 92%
- Title: Risk factors for severe disease in patients admitted with COVID-19 to a hospital in London, England: a retrospective cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- LMIC-PRIEST: Derivation and validation of a clinical severity score for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19 in a middle-income setting 94%
- Pandemic trends in health care use: From the hospital bed to the general practitioner with COVID-19 93%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 95%
- First and second SARS-CoV-2 waves in inner London: A comparison of admission characteristics and the impact of the B.1.1.7 variant 94%
- Improving our understanding of the social determinants of mental health: A data linkage study of mental health records and the 2011 UK census 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hospitalisation rates differed by city district and ethnicity during the first wave of COVID-19 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands 93%
- Experience with open schools and preschools in periods of high community transmission of COVID-19 in Norway during the academic year of 2020/2021. 92%
- Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive accuracy of computer-aided versions of the on-admission National Early Warning Score in estimating the risk of COVID-19 for unplanned admission to hospital: a retrospective development and validation study 93%
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a mixed-methods modified grounded theory study 92%
- Spatio-temporal modelling of referrals to outpatient respiratory clinics in the integrated care system of the Morecambe Bay area, England 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.