Back

Targeted Quantitative Plasma Metabolomics Identifies Metabolite Signatures that Distinguish Heart Failure with Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Naeem, F.; Leone, T. C.; Petucci, C.; Shoffler, C.; Kodihalli, R.; Hidalgo, T.; Tow-Keogh, C.; Mancuso, J. Y.; Tzameli, I.; Bennett, D.; Groarke, J. D.; Roth Flach, R. J.; Rader, D. J.; Kelly, D. P.

2024-07-25 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.07.24.24310961
Show abstract

BackgroundTwo general phenotypes of heart failure (HF) are recognized: HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and with preserved EF (HFpEF). To develop HF disease phenotype-specific approaches to define and guide treatment, distinguishing biomarkers are needed. The goal of this study was to utilize quantitative metabolomics on a large, diverse population to replicate and extend existing knowledge of the plasma metabolic signatures in human HF. MethodsQuantitative, targeted LC/MS plasma metabolomics was conducted on 787 samples collected by the Penn Medicine BioBank from subjects with HFrEF (n=219), HFpEF (n=357), and matched non-failing Controls (n=211). A total of 90 metabolites were analyzed, comprising 28 amino acids, 8 organic acids, and 54 acylcarnitines. 733 of these samples were also processed via an OLINK protein panel for proteomic profiling. ResultsConsistent with previous studies, unsaturated forms of medium/long chain acylcarnitines were elevated in the HFrEF group to a greater extent than the HFpEF group compared to Controls. A number of amino acid derivatives, including 1- and 3-methylhistidine, homocitrulline, and symmetric (SDMA) and asymmetric (ADMA) dimethylarginine were elevated in HF, with ADMA elevated uniquely in HFpEF. Plasma branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) were not different across the groups; however, short-chain acylcarnitine species indicative of BCAA catabolism were significantly elevated in both HF groups. The ketone body 3-hydroxybutyrate (3-HBA) and its metabolite C4-OH carnitine were uniquely elevated in the HFrEF group. Linear regression models demonstrated a significant correlation between plasma 3-HBA and NT-proBNP in both forms of HF, stronger in HFrEF. ConclusionsThese results identify plasma signatures that are shared as well as potentially distinguish between HFrEF and HFpEF. Metabolite markers for ketogenic metabolic re-programming in extra-cardiac tissues were identified as unique signatures in the HFrEF group, possibly related to the lipolytic action of increased levels of BNP. Future studies will be necessary to further validate these metabolites as HF biosignatures that may guide phenotype-specific therapeutics and provide insight into the systemic metabolic responses to HFpEF and HFrEF. Clinical Perspective What Is New?O_LI"Real world" targeted metabolomic profiling on wide range of metabolites in a diverse population of patients with HFrEF and HFpEF. C_LIO_LILevels of 3-hydroxybutyrate and its metabolite C4OH-carnitine were uniquely increased in the HFrEF group and correlated with levels of plasma NT-proBNP in both the heart failure groups, indicating the possibility of a heart-adipose-liver axis. C_LIO_LIAsymmetric dimethylarginine, a known inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, was uniquely upregulated in HFpEF suggesting that there may also be an underlying component of vascular dysregulation contributing to HFpEF pathophysiology. C_LI What Are the Clinical Implications?O_LIThe plasma metabolomic changes seen in the heart failure cohorts support the existing theory of metabolic reprogramming, providing further rationale for the pursuit of therapeutic targets for the treatment of heart failure. C_LIO_LIQuantitative metabolomic profiling shows promise for guiding therapeutic decisions in HFrEF and HFpEF. C_LIO_LIModulation of natriuretic peptides may enhance the delivery of ketone and fatty acids to the "fuel starved" failing heart. C_LI

Matching journals

1
Circulation: Heart Failure
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
#1
189× avg
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 3%
10× avg
3
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 1.0%
27× avg
4
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 2%
22× avg
5
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
6
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 40%
4.7%
7
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.2%
44× avg
8
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 1%
19× avg
9
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
10
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.4%
31× avg
11
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 82%
2.5%
12
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.9%
25× avg
13
Atherosclerosis
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 2%
14× avg
14
Hypertension
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 20 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
15
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
19× avg
16
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 28%
1.8%
17
Biomedicines
MDPI AG · based on 21 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
18
EMBO Molecular Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.7%
17× avg
19
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
American Thoracic Society · based on 23 published papers
Top 1%
14× avg
20
iScience
Elsevier BV · based on 74 published papers
Top 4%
5.7× avg
21
EBioMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 21 published papers
Top 0.4%
13× avg
22
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
9.7× avg
23
eBioMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 82 published papers
Top 6%
3.4× avg
24
JCI Insight
American Society for Clinical Investigation · based on 63 published papers
Top 5%
3.3× avg
25
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 28%
0.8%
26
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 5%
3.7× avg
27
Frontiers in Physiology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
5.9× avg
28
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
Frontiers Media SA · based on 10 published papers
Top 0.9%
15× avg
29
GeroScience
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 22 published papers
Top 2%
7.7× avg
30
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 4%
6.8× avg