Back

The TRIPOD-LLM Statement: A Targeted Guideline For Reporting Large Language Models Use

Gallifant, J.; Afshar, M.; Ameen, S.; Aphinyanaphongs, Y.; Chen, S.; Cacciamani, G.; Demner-Fushman, D.; Dligach, D.; Daneshjou, R.; Fernandes, C.; Hansen, L. H.; Landman, A.; McCoy, L. G.; Miller, T.; Moreno, A.; Munch, N.; Restrepo, D.; Savova, G.; Umeton, R.; Gichoya, J. W.; Collins, G. S.; Moons, K. G. M.; Celi, L. A.; Bitterman, D. S.

2024-07-25 health informatics
10.1101/2024.07.24.24310930 medRxiv
Show abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly being adopted in healthcare, necessitating standardized reporting guidelines. We present TRIPOD-LLM, an extension of the TRIPOD+AI statement, addressing the unique challenges of LLMs in biomedical applications. TRIPOD-LLM provides a comprehensive checklist of 19 main items and 50 subitems, covering key aspects from title to discussion. The guidelines introduce a modular format accommodating various LLM research designs and tasks, with 14 main items and 32 subitems applicable across all categories. Developed through an expedited Delphi process and expert consensus, TRIPOD-LLM emphasizes transparency, human oversight, and task-specific performance reporting. We also introduce an interactive website (https://tripod-llm.vercel.app/) facilitating easy guideline completion and PDF generation for submission. As a living document, TRIPOD-LLM will evolve with the field, aiming to enhance the quality, reproducibility, and clinical applicability of LLM research in healthcare through comprehensive reporting. COIDSB: Editorial, unrelated to this work: Associate Editor of Radiation Oncology, HemOnc.org (no financial compensation); Research funding, unrelated to this work: American Association for Cancer Research; Advisory and consulting, unrelated to this work: MercurialAI. DDF: Editorial, unrelated to this work: Associate Editor of JAMIA, Editorial Board of Scientific Data, Nature; Funding, unrelated to this work: the intramural research program at the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. JWG: Editorial, unrelated to this work: Editorial Board of Radiology: Artificial Intelligence, British Journal of Radiology AI journal and NEJM AI. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.4%
2
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 31%
5.1%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.6%
5
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
8
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
11
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%