"They don't know how to live with a child with these conditions, they can't understand...": The lived experiences of parenting a child with a genetic neurodevelopmental disorder.
Low, K. J.; Treneman-Evans, G.; Wynn, S.; GenROC Study Consortium, ; Ingram, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundA genetic neurodevelopmental diagnosis (GND) impacts all aspects of a child and familys life. GNDs are rare; most have limited natural history data. We aimed to understand parents experiences around data acquisition about their childs GNDs which can help inform clinical practice. Design and participantsThis analysis is part of the UK multicentre GenROC study. We conducted 17 semi-structured interviews with parents of children with GNDs (aged 0-15 years). Data were analysed following the principles of thematic analysis. ResultsFive main themes are reported: Impact on the family around a genetic diagnosisDistress results from diagnosis wait, the act of receiving it, associated irreversibility (loss of hope) and family/reproductive implications. GNDs and Uncertainty: Lack of data and rareness causes uncertainty for the future. Relationships with health professionalsPositive where parents are empowered and feel part of the team; Negative -parents feel not heard/believed or lack of expertise/understanding. Parent mental healthGNDs can be a significant burden to family life. Need for advocating for services is a negative impact. Isolation through rareness is a factor - this can be helped by support networks which mostly consist of gene specific Facebook groups. Development of positive parent identitiesincluding that of advocate, professional and educator. ConclusionsGNDs represent a major challenge for families, clinicians and service providers. Distressed parents are struggling to cope with challenges and suffer poor mental health. Psychosocial support, better signposting, and health professional education may help. Patient contributionPPI group contributed to topic guide development and commented on findings.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a taxonomy of care coordination for people living with rare conditions: A qualitative study 94%
- Development of models of care coordination for rare conditions: A qualitative study 93%
- Good communication is critical to supporting people living and working with a rare disease: current rare disease support perceived as inadequate. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic assessment of outcomes following a genetic diagnosis identified through a large-scale research study into developmental disorders 94%
- Development and evaluation of a novel educational program for providers on the use of polygenic risk scores 90%
- Comprehensive phenotyping of 3q29 deletion syndrome: recommendations for clinical care 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common Factors in Serious Case Reviews of Child Maltreatment where there is a Medical Cause of Death: Qualitative Thematic Analysis 94%
- Co-designing an online COmmunity suPporting familiEs after Sudden Cardiac Death (COPE-SCD) in the young 93%
- Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on pre-school children’s eating, activity and sleep behaviours: a qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- General population screening for type 1 diabetes using islet autoantibodies at the preschool vaccination visit: a proof-of-concept study (the T1Early study) 93%
- Successful incorporation of a genetic risk prediction research platform into routine newborn screening 91%
- ‘Admissions to paediatric medical wards with a primary mental health diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature’ 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Research Priorities of Individuals and Families with Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies 92%
- Documentation and prevalence of prenatal and neonatal outcomes in a cohort of individuals with KBG syndrome 92%
- Ophthalmic Manifestations of NAA10-Related and NAA15-Related Neurodevelopmental Syndrome: Analysis of Cortical Visual Impairment and Refractive Errors 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.