Back

Spatially-resolved tumour infiltrating immune cells and prognosis in breast cancer

Bernstein, A. J.; Keeman, R.; Hurson, A.; Blows, F. M.; Bolla, M. K.; Miller, J. L.; Milne, R.; Horlings, H.; van den Broek, A. J.; Bodelon, C.; Hodge, J.; Patel, A.; Teras, L. R.; Canzian, F.; Kaaks, R.; Brenner, H.; Schoettker, B.; Behrens, S.; Chang-Claude, J.; Maurer, T.; Obi, N.; Couch, F.; Ali, H. R.; Caldas, C.; Andrulis, I.; Glendon, G.; Mulligan, A. M.; Mesker, W.; Jager, A.; Heemskerk-Gerritsen, A.; Devilee, P.; Lawrence, S. M.; Lissowska, J.; Mutreja, K.; Ahearn, T.; Chanock, S.; Duggan, M. A.; Eccles, D.; Jones, J. L.; Tapper, W.; Hollestelle, A.; Hooning, M.; Martens, J.; van Deur

2024-07-22 oncology
10.1101/2024.07.22.24310819 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe immune response in breast tumors has an important role in prognosis, but the role of spatial localization of immune cells and of interaction between subtypes is not well-characterized. We evaluated the association between spatially-resolved tissue infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in a large multi-center study. Patients and methodsTissue micro-arrays with tumor cores from 17,265 breast cancer patients of European descent were stained for CD8, FOXP3, CD20, and CD163. We developed a machine learning-based tissue-segmentation and immune cell detection algorithm using Halo to score each image for the percentage of marker-positive cells by compartment (overall, stroma, or tumor). We assessed the association between log transformed TIIC scores and BCSS using Cox regression. ResultsTotal CD8+ and CD20+ TIICs (stromal and intra-tumoral) were associated with better BCSS in women with ER-negative (HR per standard deviation = 0.91 [95% CI 0.85 - 0.98] and 0.89 [0.84 - 0.94] respectively) and ER-positive disease (HR = 0.92 [95% CI 0.87 - 0.98] and 0.93 [0.86 - 0.99] respectively) in multi-marker models. In contrast, CD163+ macrophages were associated with better BCSS in ER-negative disease (0.94 [0.87 - 1.00]) and a poorer BCSS in ER-positive disease 1.04 [0.99 - 1.10]. There was no association between FOXP3 and BCSS. The observed associations tended to be stronger for intra-tumoral than stromal compartments for all markers. However, the TIIC markers account for only 7.6 percent of the variation in BCSS explained by the multi-marker fully-adjusted model for ER-negative cases and 3.0 percent for ER-positive cases. ConclusionsThe presence of intra-tumoral and stromal TIICs is associated with better BCSS in both ER-negative and ER-positive breast cancer. This may have implications for the use of immunotherapy. However, the addition of TIICs to existing prognostic models would only result in a small improvement in model performance. HighlightsStromal and intra-tumoral CD8+ and CD20+ TIICs are associated with better survival in ER+ and ER-breast cancers. Stromal and intra-tumoral CD163+ TIICs are associated with better survival in ER- and poorer survival in ER+ breast cancers. The presence of FOXP3+ tissue infiltrating lymphocytes in breast tumors was not associated with survival in breast cancer.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.8%
2
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
5
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
10
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
19
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
24
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%