Standards for Health Promoting Hospitals and Health Services: Development and tools for implementation and measurement
Groene, O.; Katsaros, K.; Chiarenza, A.; Fawkes, S.; Kristenson, M.
Show abstract
The need to reorient health services towards health promotion is greater than ever. Health systems are overburdened by treating an ever-growing number of chronic patients, many of which seek care for problems that could partly be avoided or postponed through better health promotion implementation. Since its establishment, the International Network of Health Promoting Hospitals and Health Services has explicitly addressed this issue by developing specific standards on evidence-based health promotion approaches and interventions that should be implemented in health services organizations. These approaches and interventions not only address the health of patients, but also of staff and the wider community. Since the development of the standards in 2006, health systems and legitimate patient demands have evolved considerably. At the same time, topics emerged that are strongly associated with health promotion strategies, such as the climate impact of health services. An update of the 2006 standards was therefore overdue. The purpose of this paper is, firstly, to describe the methodology used to develop and outline the 2020 Standards for Health Promoting Hospitals and Health Services. Secondly, we present a self-assessment tool, which was developed to operationalize and provide concrete measurable elements for each standard against which performance and progress towards implementation can be measured and tracked. The 2020 standards are health-oriented, continue to uphold the strategies defined in the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, and respond to recent international declarations and charters.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges faced by Human Resources for Health in Morocco: a scoping review 95%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 95%
- Strengthening government’s response to COVID-19 in Indonesia: a modified Delphi study of medical and health academics 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 96%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 95%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 95%
- Exploring variations in the implementation of a health system level policy intervention to improve maternal and child health outcomes in resource limited settings: A qualitative multiple case study from Uganda 94%
- Factors influencing the motivation of maternal health workers in conflict setting of Mogadishu, Somalia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 96%
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 95%
- Revisiting the use and effectiveness of patient-held records in rural Malawi 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 93%
- Knowledge and practices towards COVID-19 during its outbreak: a multinational cross-sectional study 92%
- Perceptions and willingness of patients and caregivers on the utilization of patient-generated health data: a cross-sectional survey 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.