Continuous Monitoring of Glucose and Oxygen using an Insertable Biomaterial-based Multianalyte Barcode Sensor
Pradhan, R.; Chimene, D.; Ko, B. S.; Goncharov, A.; Ozcan, A.; McShane, M. J.
Show abstract
Chronic diseases including diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and microvascular complications contribute significantly to global morbidity and mortality. Multiplexing technologies offer a promising approach for the simultaneous detection and management of comorbidities, providing comprehensive disease insights. In this work, we describe a miniaturized optical "barcode" sensor with high biocompatibility for continuous monitoring of glucose and oxygen. This enzymatic sensor relies on oxygen consumption in proportion to local glucose levels and the phosphorescence reporting of tissue oxygen with a lifetime-based probe. The sensor was designed to operate in a tissue environment with low levels of dissolved oxygen. The barcode sensor consists of a poly(ethylene) glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) hydrogel with four discrete compartments separately filled with glucose or oxygen-sensing phosphorescent microparticles. We evaluated the response of the barcode hydrogels to fluctuating glucose levels over the physiological range under low oxygen conditions, demonstrating controlled tuning of dynamic range and sensitivity. Moreover, the barcode sensor exhibited remarkable storage stability over 12 weeks, along with full reversibility and excellent reproducibility ([~]6% variability in phosphorescence lifetime). Electron beam sterilization had a negligible impact on the glucose response of the barcode sensors. Furthermore, our investigation revealed minimal phosphorescence lifetime changes in oxygen compartments while exhibiting increased lifetime in glucose-responsive compartments when subjected to alternating glucose concentrations (0 and 200 mg/dL), showcasing the sensors multianalyte sensing capabilities without crosstalk between compartments. Additionally, evaluation of tissue response to sensors inserted in pigs revealed appropriate biocompatibility of the barcodes.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Physical confinement impacts cellular phenotype within living materials 95%
- A hydrogel beads based platform for single-cell phenotypic analysis and digital molecular detection 95%
- Durability of photografted zwitterionic hydrogel coatings for reduction of the foreign body response to cochlear implants 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Superhydrophobic Rotation-Chip for Computer-Vision Identification of Drug-Resistant Bacteria 95%
- Self-assembly of microstructured protein coatings with programmable functionality for fluorescent biosensors 94%
- CellStudio: a Modular, Tunable and Accessible Platform for Analysis of Growth Factors Secretions in Cell Cultures 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Versatile Photocrosslinkable Silicone Composite for 3D Printing Applications 96%
- Evaluating Flow-Focused Microfluidic Device Fabrication Techniques for Silk Fibroin Microgel Production 95%
- Remote-Controlled Wireless Bioelectronics for Fluoxetine Therapy to Promote Wound Healing in a Porcine Model 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low-temperature integration of printed electrochemical sensors into OSTE+ micrfluidics for oxygen monitoring and sensing 96%
- Micropillar enhanced FRET-CRISPR biosensor for nucleic acid detection 96%
- Leveraging the Elastic Deformability of Polydimethylsiloxane Microfluidic Channels for Efficient Intracellular Delivery 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- In vivo Monitoring of Glucose using Ultrasound-induced Resonance in Implantable Smart Hydrogel Microstructures 96%
- An optical aptamer-based cytokine nanosensor detects macrophage activation by bacterial toxins 95%
- Real-time respiration changes as a viability indicator for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing in a microfluidic chamber array 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.