Back

Using Multimodal Data Collection System as a Research Tool in the Major Depressive Disorder Analysis: a cross-sectional study protocol

Li, H.; Ji, Y.; Xu, L.; Yang, J.; Du, Y.; Hu, M.; An, N.

2024-07-22 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.07.21.24310061 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPrevious studies have established that depressive syndromes can be detected using machine learning methods, with multimodal data being essential. Multimodal data facilitates the extraction of characteristics such as gaze tracking, a reliable depression indicator. Our study employs high-quality video and other multimodal data from patients diagnosed with depression. Our study uses a multimodal data collection system (MDC) to understand the complex indicators of depression. ObjectiveThis paper outlines our protocol for deploying a multimodal data collection system within an In-Person Clinical Assessment environment. The system gathers high-definition videos, real-time vital signs, and voice recordings for future extraction of critical information such as eye gaze patterns. We aim to scale our model to provide portable depression risk analyses, facilitating timely intervention and encouraging patients to seek professional assistance. Methods and AnalysisWe have conducted sessions with 70 participants diagnosed with depression. Each participant undergoes DSM-5 interviews and engages with our multimodal data collection system. Participants respond to five on-screen scales while being recorded. To our knowledge, no other protocol has combined multimodal data collection and various stimuli in depression data collection. Ethics and DisseminationEthical approval was provided by the National Health Commission of the PRC, Hefei Fourth Peoples Hospital Ethics Committee (HSY-IRB-YJ-YYYX-JYF001). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at academic conferences.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.