Deep Learning-based Modeling for Preclinical Drug Safety Assessment
Jaume, G.; de Brot, S.; Song, A. H.; Williamson, D. F. K.; Oldenburg, L.; Zhang, A.; Chen, R. J.; Asin, J.; Blatter, S.; Dettwiler, M.; Gopfert, C.; Grau Roma, L.; Soto, S.; Keller, S.; Rottenberg, S.; del-Pozo, J.; Pettit, R.; Le, L. P.; Mahmood, F.
Show abstract
In drug development, assessing the toxicity of candidate compounds is crucial for successfully transitioning from preclinical research to early-stage clinical trials. Drug safety is typically assessed using animal models with a manual histopathological examination of tissue sections to characterize the dose-response relationship of the compound - a timeintensive process prone to inter-observer variability and predominantly involving tedious review of cases without abnormalities. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods in pathology hold promise to accelerate this assessment and enhance reproducibility and objectivity. Here, we introduce TRACE, a model designed for toxicologic liver histopathology assessment capable of tackling a range of diagnostic tasks across multiple scales, including situations where labeled data is limited. TRACE was trained on 15 million histopathology images extracted from 46,734 digitized tissue sections from 157 preclinical studies conducted on Rattus norvegicus. We show that TRACE can perform various downstream toxicology tasks spanning histopathological response assessment, lesion severity scoring, morphological retrieval, and automatic dose-response characterization. In an independent reader study, TRACE was evaluated alongside ten board-certified veterinary pathologists and achieved higher concordance with the consensus opinion than the average of the pathologists. Our study represents a substantial leap over existing computational models in toxicology by offering the first framework for accelerating and automating toxicological pathology assessment, promoting significant progress with faster, more consistent, and reliable diagnostic processes. Live Demo: https://mahmoodlab.github.io/tox-foundation-ui/
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- STAIG: Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis via Image-Aided Graph Contrastive Learning for Domain Exploration and Alignment-Free Integration 96%
- Triple-effect correction for Cell Painting data with contrastive and domain-adversarial learning 96%
- PHARAOH: A collaborative crowdsourcing platform for PHenotyping And Regional Analysis Of Histology 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying perturbations that boost T-cell infiltration into tumours via counterfactual learning of their spatial proteomic profiles 94%
- Combinatorial prediction of therapeutic perturbations using causally-inspired neural networks 94%
- Ultra-fast Prediction of Somatic Structural Variations by Reduced Read Mapping via Pan-Genome k-mer Sets 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting MammaPrint Recurrence Risk from Breast Cancer Pathological Images Using a Weakly Supervised Transformer 96%
- Information-Distilled Generative Label-Free Morphological Profiling Encodes Cellular Heterogeneity 95%
- Unsupervised segmentation of 3D microvascular photoacoustic images using deep generative learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.