CGPA: multi-context insights from the cancer gene prognosis atlas
Cao, B.; Yu, X.; Gonzalez, G.; Murthy, A. R.; Li, T.; Shen, Y.; Yao, S.; Conejo-Garcia, J. R.; Jiang, P.; Wang, X.
Show abstract
Cancer transcriptomic data are used extensively to interrogate the prognostic value of targeted genes, yet basic scientists and clinicians have predominantly relied on univariable survival analysis for this purpose. This method often fails to capture the full prognostic potential and contextual relevance of the genes under study, inadvertently omitting a group of genes we term univariable missed-opportunity prognostic (UMOP) genes. Recognizing the complexity of revealing multifaceted prognostic implications, especially when extending the analysis to include various covariates and thresholds, we present the Cancer Gene Prognosis Atlas (CGPA). This platform greatly enhances gene-centric biomarker research across cancer types by offering an interactive and user-friendly interface for highly customized, in-depth prognostic analysis. CGPA notably supports data-driven exploration of gene pairs and gene-hallmark relationships, elucidating key composite biological mechanisms like synthetic lethality and immunosuppression. It further expands its capabilities to assess multi-gene panels using both public and user-provided data, facilitating a seamless mechanism-to-machine analysis. Additionally, CGPA features a designated portal for discovering prognostic gene modules using curated cancer immunotherapy data. Ultimately, CGPAs comprehensive, accessible tools allow cancer researchers, including those without statistical expertise, to precisely investigate the prognostic landscape of genes, customizing the model to fit specific research hypotheses and enhancing biomarker discovery and validation through a synergy of mechanistic and data-driven strategies. SignificanceCGPA is a streamlined, interactive platform for multi-context gene-centric prognostic analysis, simplifying biomarker discovery and validation in oncology for clinicians and basic scientists, and bridging a critical gap in translational cancer research.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- NCT Precision Oncology Thesaurus Drugs – a Curated Database for Drugs, Drug Classes, and Drug Targets in Precision Cancer Medicine 93%
- Machine learning and mechanistic modeling for prediction of metastatic relapse in breast cancer 92%
- Towards Predicting 30-Day Readmission among Oncology Patients: Identifying Timely and Actionable Risk Factors 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Survival Genie, a web platform for survival analysis across pediatric and adult cancers. 97%
- Genome-wide investigation of gene-cancer associations for the prediction of novel therapeutic targets in oncology 94%
- Accurate prognosis for localized prostate cancer through coherent voting networks and multi-omic data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- IOBR: Multi-omics Immuno-Oncology Biological Research to decode tumor microenvironment and signatures 94%
- Integrated immunogenomic analyses of high-grade serous ovarian cancer reveal vulnerability to combination immunotherapy 93%
- A three-gene expression score for predicting clinical benefit to anti-PD-1 blockade in advanced renal cell carcinoma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- CAMOIP: A Web Server for Comprehensive Analysis on Multi-Omics of Immunotherapy in Pan-cancer 96%
- Computationally scalable regression modeling for ultrahigh-dimensional omics data with ParProx 95%
- TG468: A Text Graph Convolutional Network for Predicting Clinical Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- driveR: A Novel Method for Prioritizing Cancer Driver Genes Using Somatic Genomics Data 95%
- scMuffin: an R package for disentangling solid tumor heterogeneity from single-cell expression data 93%
- PDXGEM: Patient-Derived Tumor Xenograft based Gene Expression Model for Predicting Clinical Response to Anticancer Therapy in Cancer Patients 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.