Back

Reduced functional fungal communities in two species of sloths (Bradypus variegatus and Choloepus hoffmanni) suggest a link to slow digestion

Chaverri, P.; Escudero-Leyva, E.; Mora-Rojas, D.; Calvo-Obando, A.; Gonzalez, M.; Escalante-Campos, E.; Mesen-Porras, E.; Wicki-Emmenegger, D.; Rojas-Gatjens, D.; Avey-Arroyo, J.; Campos-Hernandez, M.; Castellon, E.; Moreira-Soto, A.; Drexler, J. F.; Chavarria, M.

2024-07-20 microbiology
10.1101/2024.07.19.604311 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sloths, with their ruminant-like digestive systems, possess the slowest digestion among mammals due to their low metabolic rate, minimal food intake, and extremely low-energy diet. However, no comprehensive studies have characterized the sloths gut microbiota, including fungi, and their role in digestion. This study hypothesized that effective plant fiber-degrading fungi (e.g., Neocallimastigomycota) would be scarce in the sloths gut. The aim was to describe the gut microbiota of three-toed (Bradypus variegatus) and two-toed (Choloepus hoffmanni) sloths to understand their link to slow digestion. Microbial composition and functionality were analyzed using shotgun metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, fungal metabarcoding (ITS 1 and 2 nrDNA), and cellulose degradation analysis. Microbial communities were dominated by bacteria (92-97%), followed by viruses (1-7%). Fungi accounted for only 0.06-0.5% of metagenomic reads and 0.1% of transcripts. Functional analysis revealed minimal CAZy abundance (1.7-1.9% in metagenomes, 0.2% in metatranscriptomes), with no fungal CAZys or glycoside hydrolases detected. Neocallimastigomycota had negligible abundance in metagenomic data and was absent in metatranscriptomic or ITS metabarcoding data. Bradypus variegatus showed overall lower CAZy abundance and fungal presence compared to Choloepus hoffmanni. Lastly, cellulose degradation analyses revealed that only [~]5-35% of the intake was digested. This study highlights the unique microbial ecosystem in sloths guts, showing minimal presence of plant fiber-degrading anaerobic fungi and limited microbial CAZys, aligning with their slow digestion and low metabolic rate, thus enhancing our understanding of their digestive efficiency and metabolic adaptations.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
3
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.2%
4
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
6
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
7
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
10
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
11
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
20
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
21
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
22
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
25
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%
30
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%