Automated, Objective Speech and Language Markers of Longitudinal Changes in Psychosis Symptoms
Tang, S. X.; Spilka, M. J.; John, M.; Birnbaum, M. L.; Saito, E.; Berretta, S. A.; Behbehani, L. M.; Liberman, M. Y.; Malhotra, A. K.; Simpson, W.; Kane, J. M.
Show abstract
Background and HypothesesWe sought to evaluate the ability of automated speech and language features to track fluctuations in the major psychosis symptoms domains: Thought Disorder, Negative Symptoms, and Positive Symptoms. Study DesignSixty-six participants with psychotic disorders were longitudinally assessed soon after inpatient admission, at discharge, and at 3- and 6-months. Psychosis symptoms were measured with semi-structured interviews and standardized scales. Recordings were collected from paragraph reading, fluency, picture description, and open-ended tasks. Longitudinal relationships between psychosis symptoms and 357 automated speech and language features were analyzed using a single component score and as individual features, using linear mixed models. Study ResultsAll three psychosis symptom domains demonstrated significant longitudinal relationships with the single component score. Thought Disorder was particularly related to features describing more subordinated constructions, less efficient identification of picture elements, and decreased semantic distance between sentences. Negative Symptoms was related to features describing decreased speech complexity. Positive Symptoms appeared heterogeneous, with Suspiciousness relating to greater use of nouns, and Hallucinations related to decreased semantic distances. These relationships were largely robust to interactions with gender and race. However, interactions with timepoint revealed variable relationships during different phases of illness (acute vs. stable). ConclusionsAutomated speech and language features show promise as scalable, objective markers of psychosis severity. The three symptom domains appear to be distinguishable with different features. Detailed attention to clinical setting and patient population is needed to optimize clinical translation; there are substantial implications for facilitating differential diagnosis, improving psychosis outcomes and enhancing therapeutic discovery.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Latent Factors of Language Disturbance and Relationships to Quantitative Speech Features 97%
- Motor and Activity Psychosis-Risk (MAP-R) Scale: An exploration of scale structure with replication and validation 95%
- Validation of an ICD-code-based case definition for psychotic illness across three health systems 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developmental Influences on Symptom Expression in Antipsychotic-Naive First-Episode Psychosis 95%
- Jumping To Conclusions, General Intelligence, And Psychosis Liability: Findings From The Multicentric EU-GEI Case-Control Study 94%
- A Systematic Review on Psychological and Biological Mediators Between Adversity and Psychosis: Potential Targets for Treatment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Progressive changes in descriptive discourse in First Episode of Schizophrenia: A longitudinal computational semantics study 95%
- Who Does What to Whom? Graph Representations of Action-Predication in Speech Relate to Psychopathological Dimensions of Psychosis 95%
- Early visual processing as a marker of disease, not vulnerability: Event-related potential (ERP) evidence from 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, a population at high risk for schizophrenia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.