Back

MSPTDfast: An Efficient Photoplethysmography Beat Detection Algorithm

Charlton, P. H.; Mant, J.; Kyriacou, P. A.

2024-07-18 health informatics
10.1101/2024.07.18.24310627 medRxiv
Show abstract

Beat detection is a key step in the analysis of photo-plethysmogram (PPG) signals. The MSPTD algorithm was recently identified as one of the most accurate beat detection algorithms, but its current open-source implementation is substantially more computationally expensive than other leading algorithms such as qppgfast. The aim of this work was to develop a more efficient, open-source implementation of the MSPTD algorithm. Five potential improvements were identified to increase efficiency. Each potential improvement was evaluated in turn, and an optimal algorithm configuration named MSPTDfast was developed which incorporated all of the improvements found to reduce algorithm execution time whilst not substantially reducing the accuracy of beat detection. Performance was assessed using data collected from young adults during a lunchbreak in the PPG-DaLiA dataset. The data consisted of wrist PPG signals acquired using an Empatica E4 device, alongside simultaneous ECG signals from which reference heartbeat timings were obtained. MSPTDfast was found to be substantially more efficient than MSPTD (a reduction in execution time of 72.3%), with minimal difference in beat detection accuracy (F1-score 87.8% vs. 87.7%). In addition, the performance of MSPTDfast was much closer to that of the state-of-the-art qppgfast algorithm than the MSPTD algorithm, with a comparable F1-score (87.4% vs. 87.7%), and an execution time which was only 19.2% longer than that of qppgfast (vs. 330.8% longer for MSPTD). In conclusion, MSPTD-fast is an efficient and accurate open-source PPG beat detection algorithm with a substantially faster execution time than MSPTD. It is available under the permissive MIT licence.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.7%
4
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
5
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.2%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
9
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
14
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.0%
20
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%