Back

A Lightweight, End-to-End Explainable, and Generalized attention-based graph neural network to Classify Autism Spectrum Disorder using Meta-Connectivity

Bhavna, K.; Ghosh, N.; Banerjee, R.; Roy, D.

2024-07-18 health informatics
10.1101/2024.07.17.24310610 medRxiv
Show abstract

1Recent technological advancement in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been extensively used to diagnose brain disorders such as autism (ASD), which is associated with deficits in social communication, interaction, and restricted/repetitive behaviors. However, the existing machine-learning/deep-learning (ML/DL) models suffer from low accuracy and explainability due to their internal architecture and feature extraction techniques, which also predominantly focus on node-centric features. As a result, performance is moderate on unseen data due to ignorance of edge-centric features. Here, we argue that meaningful features and information can be extracted by focusing on meta connectivity between large-scale brain networks which is an edge-centric higher order dynamic correlation in time. In the current study, we have proposed a novel explainable and generalized node-edge connectivity-based graph attention neural network(Ex-NEGAT) model to classify ASD subjects from neuro-typicals (TD) on unseen data using a node edge-centric feature set for the first time and predicted their symptom severity scores. We used ABIDE (I and II) dataset with a large sample size (Total no. of samples = 1500). The framework employs meta-connectivity derived from Theory-of-Mind (ToM), Default-mode Network (DMN), Central executive (CEN), and Salience network (SN) that measure the dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) as a flow across morphing connectivity configurations. To generalize the Ex-NEGAT model, we trained the proposed model on ABIDE I(No. of samples =840) and performed testing on the ABIDE II(no. of samples =660) dataset and achieved 88% accuracy with an F1-score of 0.89. Additionally, we identified symptom severity scores for each individual subjects using their meta-connectivity links between relevant brain networks and passing that to Connectome-based Prediction Modelling (CPM) pipeline to identify the specific large-scale brain networks whose edge connectivity contributed positively and negatively to the prediction. Our approach accurately predicted ADOS-Total, ADOS-Social, ADOS-Communication, ADOS-Module, ADOS-STEREO, and FIQ scores.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
43.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
4
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
5
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
6
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
7
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
12
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
14
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
15
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
17
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
18
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.5%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%