Back

Predicting Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in Individuals Below Screening Age Using Machine Learning and Real-World Data

Sun, C.; Mobley, E.; Quillen, M.; Parker, M.; Daly, M.; Wang, R.; Visintin, I.; Ziad, Z.; Fishe, J.; Parker, A.; George, T.; Bian, J.; Xu, J.

2024-07-17 health informatics
10.1101/2024.07.17.24310573 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is now the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among young Americans. Our study aims to predict early-onset CRC (EOCRC) using machine learning (ML) and structured electronic health record (EHR) data for individuals under the screening age of 45. MethodsWe identified a cohort of patients under 45 from the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Consortium. Given the distinct pathology of colon cancer (CC) and rectal cancer (RC), we created separate prediction models for each cancer type with various ML algorithms. We assessed multiple prediction time windows (0, 1, 3, and 5 years) and ensured robustness through propensity score matching (PSM) to account for confounding variables. Model performance was assessed using established metrics. Additionally, we employed the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to identify risk factors for EOCRC. ResultsOur study yielded results, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) scores of 0.811, 0.748, 0.689, and 0.686 for CC prediction, and 0.829, 0.771, 0.727, and 0.721 for RC prediction at 0, 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Notably, predictors included immune and digestive system disorders, along with secondary cancers and underweight, prevalent in both CC and RC groups. Blood diseases emerged as prominent indicators of CC. ConclusionThis study highlights the potential of ML techniques in leveraging EHR data to predict EOCRC, offering valuable insights for potential early diagnosis in patients who are below the recommended screening age.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.