A Development Framework for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Health with Example Code Pipelines
de-Manuel-y-Vicente, C.; Fernandez-Narro, D.; Blanes-Selva, V.; Garcia-Gomez, J. M.; Saez, C.
Show abstract
Technological trends point to Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a crucial tool in healthcare, but its development must respect human rights and ethical standards to ensure robustness and safety. Despite general good practices are available, health AI developers lack a practical guide to address the construction of trustworthy AI. We introduce a development framework to serve as a reference guideline for the creation of trustworthy AI systems in health. The framework provides an extensible Trustworthy AI matrix that classifies technical methods addressing the EU guideline for Trustworthy AI requirements (privacy and data governance; diversity, non-discrimination and fairness; transparency; and technical robustness and safety) across the different AI lifecycle stages (data preparation; model development, deployment and use, and model management). The matrix is complemented with generic but customizable example code pipelines for the different requirements with state-of-the-art AI techniques using Python. A related checklist is provided to help validate the application of different methods on new problems. The framework is validated using two representative open datasets, and it is provided as Open Source to the scientific and development community. The presented framework provides health AI developers with a theoretical development guideline with practical examples, aiming to ensure the development of robust and safe health AI and Clinical Decision Support Systems. GitHub repository: https://github.com/bdslab-upv/trustworthy-ai
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 94%
- A data management system for precision medicine 92%
- Collaborative intelligence in AI: Evaluating the performance of a council of AIs on the USMLE 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 93%
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 92%
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of Myocardial Infarction (MI) Probability from Imbalanced Medical Survey Data: An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with Explainable AI (XAI) Insights 92%
- A machine-learning Approach for Stress Detection Using Wearable Sensors in Free-living Environments 92%
- A fast, accurate, and generalisable heuristic-based negation detection algorithm for clinical text 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 94%
- Towards Reliable Diabetes Prediction: Innovations in Data Engineering and Machine Learning Applications 92%
- How suitable are clinical vignettes for the evaluation of symptom checker apps? A test theoretical perspective 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A standardized analytics pipeline for reliable and rapid development and validation of prediction models using observational health data 92%
- A deep learning workflow for quantification of Micronuclei in DNA damage studies in cultured cancer cell lines: a proof of principle investigation 91%
- Improving Heart Disease Probability Prediction Sensitivity with a Grow Network Model 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.