Back

The Energetics of Maintaining the Lateral Balance Are Terrain-Specific; a Normal Lookahead Significantly Reduces Active Balance Maintenance Work

Hosseini-Yazdi, S.-S.

2024-08-01 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.07.16.603705 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Humans must actively control their lateral balance through frontal plane work or adjusting lateral foot placement. With constant muscle efficiency and considering the energetic consequences of Center of Mass (COM) work variability, we estimated the metabolic cost of lateral balance maintenance and compared it with the Workman model. Like the Workman model, we found that lateral balance energetics were mainly associated with terrain amplitude. Increased walking speeds effect on step transition work might be offset by reduced step width. A significant rise in lateral work magnitude (+157.1%) with restricted lookahead was potentially linked to wider steps. Comparing mechanical work with the Workman model, we found significant differences in magnitudes, suggesting that the Workman model included additional costs such as force rate generation, muscle coactivation, or posture maintenance not reflected in the COM lateral work and its variability. Practitioner SummaryLateral balance maintenance during walking requires active regulation, yet it is not studied mechanically. Our study found that lateral control costs are terrain-specific and increase with restricted lookahead. With age, only variability increases. We assume associated energetics rise with both work and variability.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.1%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.5%
3
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
5
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.0%
6
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
7
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
9
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
13
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
14
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
16
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
19
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
22
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
24
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%