Back

Clinical And Cognitive Phenotyping Of Copy Number Variants Pathogenic For Neurodevelopmental Disorders From A Multi-Ancestry Biobank

Zaks, N.; Mahjani, B.; Reichenberg, A.; Birnbaum, R.

2024-07-16 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.07.16.24310489 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundClinical biobanks linking electronic health records (EHRs) with genotype data are expanding, enabling investigation of genomic risk factors for psychiatric disorders. However, few recall-by-genotype (RbG) studies have been published--particularly for psychiatric risk variants in diverse healthcare systems--indicating a need for further research to inform implementation. Some rare copy number variants (CNVs) confer substantially increased risk for neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) and cognitive impairment. We recalled NDD CNV carriers from BioMe, a multi-ancestry biobank within the Mount Sinai Health System, for in-depth phenotyping and empirical insights into the implementation of RbG in psychiatry. MethodsFrom BioMe, 892 adults were recontacted: 335 NDD CNV carriers, 217 with schizophrenia, and 340 neurotypical controls. Of these, 18% responded to recontact, 12% were screened for participation, and 10% began the study. Participants completed structured clinical and cognitive assessments. ResultsSeventy-three participants (8% of those recontacted) completed the study: 30 NDD CNV carriers, 20 schizophrenia cases, and 23 controls. The mean age was 48.8 years, 66% were female, and ancestry was 37% African, 34% Hispanic, and 26% European. Seventy percent of NDD CNV carriers had at least one neuropsychiatric or developmental condition, including 40% with mood or anxiety disorders. Among 22 NDD CNV carriers at loci previously examined for cognitive effects, performance was impaired on digit span backward ({beta}= -1.76, FDR = 0.04) and sequencing ({beta}= -2.01, FDR = 0.04) compared with controls but outperformed schizophrenia cases on verbal learning ({beta}= 4.5, FDR = 0.05). ConclusionsThis proof-of-concept RbG study of rare psychiatric risk variants from a multi-ancestry biobank demonstrates both opportunities and challenges for recontact within healthcare systems. Despite modest enrollment, recalling individuals--including those affected by psychiatric illness and cognitive impairment--yielded a genotypically defined cohort and phenotypes not captured in EHRs, underscoring the potential of RbG to advance precision psychiatry.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
2
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.2%
3
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
5
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
7
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
8
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
11
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
12
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
13
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
15
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
19
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
23
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Schizophrenia
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
Autism Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%
28
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%