Back

Mathematical model of transcription loss due to accumulated DNA damage

Raseta, M.; Grint, J. v. d.; Dealy, S.; Chang, J.; Hoeijmakers, J.; Pothof, J.

2024-07-18 systems biology
10.1101/2024.07.15.603615 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We offer a simple mathematical model of gene transcription loss due to accumulated DNA damage in time based on widely agreed biological axioms. Closed form formulae characterizing the distribution of the underlying stochastic processes representing the transcription loss upon specified number of DNA damages are obtained. Moreover, the asymptotic behavior of the stochastic process was analyzed. Finally, the distribution of the first hitting time of transcription loss to specified biologically relevant levels was studied both analytically and computationally on mice data.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Theoretical Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Journal of Mathematical Biology
○ 40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
● 235 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.8%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Mathematical Biosciences
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
○ 92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
6
Physical Review E
● 112 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
7
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.1%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.1%
9
Theoretical Population Biology
○ 50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
11
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
12
Physical Review Research
● 49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.4%
15
Physical Biology
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
16
PNAS Nexus
◐ 159 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
● 15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
○ 102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Entropy
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Biophysical Journal
○ 631 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
GENETICS
◐ 483 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
PLOS Genetics
● 862 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.