Back

Predicting future patterns of land cover from climate projections using machine learning

Stepinski, T.

2024-07-17 ecology
10.1101/2024.07.14.603429 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Vegetation plays a crucial role in the Earths system, and its characteristics are strongly influenced by climate. Previous studies have investigated the climate-vegetation relationship, often attempting to predict vegetation types based on climate data. Many of them have utilized biome types as proxies for different vegetation forms. Biomes, although widely used, are not always optimal for this task. They are broadly defined, a priori linked to climate, and subject to change over time. This study proposes a novel approach by using the local composition of land cover (LC) categories as descriptors of vegetation types and examines the feasibility of modeling such compositions based on climate data. The investigation focuses on the Sahel region of Africa, which is tessellated into 5 x 5 km square tiles, serving as the basic units of analysis. The independent variable comprises a set of bioclimatic variables assigned to each tile, while the dependent variable consists of shares of each LC category within the tile. The modeling framework involves a set of n regressions, one for each LC category. The K-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm is employed to ensure that interdependently predicted shares sum up to 100%. The models performance is validated using 2010 data, where both climate and LC information are available. The mean absolute value of residuals ranges from 1% to 11%, depending on the LC category. Subsequently, future predictions of LC patterns are made for 2040, 2070, and 2100 using climate projections under IPCC scenarios 370 and 585. A novel visualization technique called synthetic landscape is introduced to visually compare the temporal sequence of predicted LC maps from 2010 to 2100 with similar sequences of biome maps and Koppen-Geiger climate type maps. This comparison highlights overall similarities across all sequences but also reveals some significant differences.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
7
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
16
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
18
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
21
Journal of Thermal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
GeoHealth
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%