Oxford Nanopore's 2024 sequencing technology for Listeria monocytogenes outbreak detection and source attribution: progress and clone-specific challenges
Biggel, M.; Cernela, N.; Horlbog, J. A.; Stephan, R.
Show abstract
Whole genome sequencing is an essential cornerstone of pathogen surveillance and outbreak detection. Established sequencing technologies are currently challenged by Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT), which offers an accessible and cost-effective alternative enabling gap-free assemblies of chromosomes and plasmids. Limited accuracy has hindered its use for investigating pathogen transmission, but recent technology updates have brought significant improvements. To evaluate its readiness for outbreak detection, we selected 78 Listeria monocytogenes isolates from diverse lineages or known epidemiological clusters for sequencing with ONTs V14 Rapid Barcoding Kit and R10.4.1 flow cells. The most accurate of several tested workflows generated assemblies with a median of one error (SNP or indel) per assembly. For 66 isolates, cgMLST profiles from ONT-only assemblies were identical to those generated from Illumina data. Eight assemblies were of lower quality with more than 20 erroneous sites each, primarily caused by methylations at the GAAGAC motif (5'-GAAG6mAC-3 / 3'-GT4mCTTC-5'). This led to inaccurate clustering, failing to group isolates from a persistence-associated clone that carried the responsible restriction-modification system. Out of 50 methylation motifs detected among the 78 isolates, only the GAAGAC motif was linked to substantially increased error rates. Our study shows that most L. monocytogenes genomes assembled from ONT-only data are suitable for high-resolution genotyping, but further improvements of chemistries or basecallers are required for reliable routine use in outbreak and food safety investigations.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the accuracy of bacterial genome reconstruction with Oxford Nanopore R10.4.1 long-read-only sequencing 96%
- Rapid and accurate SNP genotyping of clonal bacterial pathogens with BioHansel 95%
- Comparison of R9.4.1/Kit10 and R10/Kit12 Oxford Nanopore flowcells and chemistries in bacterial genome reconstruction 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurate genotyping of three major respiratory bacterial pathogens with ONT R10.4.1 long-read sequencing 97%
- Accurate bacterial outbreak tracing with Oxford Nanopore sequencing and reduction of methylation-induced errors 95%
- High precision Neisseria gonorrhoeae variant and antimicrobial resistance calling from metagenomic Nanopore sequencing 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- German-wide interlaboratory study compares consistency, accuracy and reproducibility of whole-genome short read sequencing 96%
- Monitoring the Antimicrobial Resistance Dynamics of Salmonella enterica in Healthy Dairy Cattle Populations at the Individual Farm Level Using Whole-Genome Sequencing 95%
- No Assembly Required: Using BTyper3 to Assess the Congruency of a Proposed Taxonomic Framework for the Bacillus cereus group with Historical Typing Methods 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population structure of Bacillus cereus sensu lato associated with foodborne outbreaks in France between 2004 and 2023 95%
- Genomic factors contributing to the resilience of Salmonella enterica on ready-to-eat muskmelon 93%
- Comprehensive Identification of Pathogenic Microbes and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Food Products Using Nanopore Sequencing-Based Metagenomics 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.