Back

'I like being autistic': Assessing the benefit of autistic-led psychoeducation for autistic children

Mullally, S. L.; Edwards, C. C.; Wood, A. E.; Connolly, S. E.; Constable, H.; Watson, S.; Rodgers, J.

2024-07-14 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.07.12.24310317 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite receiving autism diagnoses in early life, autistic children are not routinely supported to understand these diagnoses post-diagnostically (1). Consequently, they typically grow-up lacking an accurate understanding of what it means to be autistic on both a collective and individual level (2). Without this foundational knowledge, childrens understanding of autism is garnered from how others perceive their autism, resulting in an understanding of autism, and of themselves, that is inherently negative (3). This lack of appreciation of their own individual needs, also denies them the important self-understanding afforded by the diagnosis in the first instance, alongside the opportunity to effectively self-advocate for themselves when these needs go unmet. AimsHere we sought to directly assess the benefit of a pre-recorded, online autistic-led psychoeducation course about autism and the lived experience of being autistic (i.e., NeuroBears https://www.pandasonline.org), for childrens understanding of autism and their autistic experiences, their feeling about being autistic, their communication with others about their autistic experiences, and their confidence to self-advocate for their needs. MethodsUsing a concurrent embedded mixed-methods, repeated-measures design, autistic children (aged 8-14 years), completed a bespoke questionnaire exploring the above topics, both before and after completing NeuroBears at home with a nominated safe adult. A total of 63 children (mean age=10.57 years) completed sufficient content to be included in the analysis. ResultsSignificant benefit was observed across a range of areas, including a significant improvement in the childrens knowledge and understanding of being autistic and of their unique strengths and challenges, a significant rebalancing of how the children viewed being autistic, evidence of emerging positive autistic identities and a growing sense of belongingness, a significant change in the childrens abilities to communicate about being autistic, and evidence of strengthening self-advocacy skills. ConclusionLearning about autism in a neutral and non-stigmatizing manner, and presented through the lens of autistic lived experience, conferred numerous benefits on autistic childrens self-understanding, emergent autistic identity, sense of belonging, and on their communication/self-advocacy skills. Future work is needed to establish the downstream benefits on wellbeing and quality of life.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.4%
2
Molecular Autism
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
3
Autism Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
5
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.5%
7
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
9
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
11
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
13
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
14
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
15
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
16
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
17
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
20
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
22
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
23
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
24
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
26
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.5%