Radiobiological meta-analysis of the response of prostate cancer to high dose rate brachytherapy
Koelmel, E. G.; Pombar, M.; Pardo-Montero, J.
Show abstract
Background and purposeClinical studies have shown a marked reduction in tumor control in prostate cancer treated with radically hypofractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). The purpose of this study was to analyze the dose-response of prostate cancer treated with HDR-BT, specifically aiming at investigating the potential failure of the linear-quadratic (LQ) model to describe the response at large dosesper-fraction. Materials and methodsWe collated a dataset of dose-response to HDR-BT (3258 patients). The analysis was conducted separately for low and intermediate risk, resulting in 21 schedules (1643 patients) and 22 schedules (1615 patients), respectively. Data were fitted to tumor control probability models based on the LQ model, the linear-quadratic-linear (LQL), and a modification of the LQ model to include the effect of reoxygenation during treatment. ResultsThe LQ cannot fit the data unless the /{beta} is allowed to be very high ([~][20-100] Gy, 95% confidence interval). If the /{beta} is constrained to be low (< 8 Gy) the LQ model cannot reproduce the clinical results, and the LQL model, which includes a moderation of radiation damage with increasing dose, significantly improves the fitting. On the other hand, the reoxygenation model does not match the results obtained with the LQL. ConclusionThe clinically observed reduction in tumor control in prostate cancer treated with radical HDR-BT is better described by the LQL model. Using the best-fitting parameters, the BED for a 20 Gy x 1 treatment (95 Gy) is far less than that of a conventional 2 Gy x 37 fractionation (184 Gy). These results may assist in the design of radical HDR-BT treatment.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cluster-Based Toxicity Estimation of Osteoradionecrosis via Unsupervised Machine Learning: Moving Beyond Single Dose-Parameter Normal Tissue Complication Probability by Using Whole Dose-Volume Histograms for Cohort Risk Stratification 97%
- Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) prediction model for osteoradionecrosis of the mandible in head and neck cancer patients following radiotherapy: Large-scale observational cohort 96%
- Clinical Impact of Contouring Variability for Prostate Cancer Tumor Boost 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of indirect damage and damage saturation effects in dose-response curves of hypofractionated radiotherapy of early-stage NSCLC and brain metastases 96%
- Artificial Intelligence Uncertainty Quantification in Radiotherapy Applications - A Scoping Review 95%
- Dosimetric and biologic intercomparison between electron and proton FLASH beams 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Morphological changes after cranial fractionated photon radiotherapy: localized loss of white matter and grey matter volume with increasing dose 94%
- Re-irradiation to the Prostate using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after initial definitive Radiotherapy – A systematic review and Meta-analysis of recent trials 94%
- Personalized volume-deescalated elective nodal irradiation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (DeEscO): a study protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Standardising Breast Radiotherapy Structure Naming Conventions: A Machine Learning Approach 95%
- Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes following proton therapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review 95%
- Effectiveness of FLASH vs conventional dose rate radiotherapy in a model of orthotopic, murine breast cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intermittent radiotherapy as alternative treatment for recurrent high grade glioma: A modelling study based on longitudinal tumor measurements 95%
- Multiwell-based G0-PCC assay for radiation biodosimetry 94%
- Modulating the unfolded protein response: Impacts of radiation on the response of prostate cancer cells to ONC201 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.