Back

Single-nanoparticle electrophoretic mobility and trapping using active-feedback 3D tracking

Johnson, A.; Welsher, K.

2024-07-11 biophysics
10.1101/2024.07.08.602591 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nanoparticles (NP) are versatile materials with widespread applications across medicine and engineering. Despite rapid incorporation into drug delivery, therapeutics, and many more areas of research and development, there is a lack of robust characterization methods. Light scattering techniques such as dynamic light scattering (DLS) and electrophoretic light scattering (ELS) use an ensemble-averaged approach to the characterization of nanoparticle size and electrophoretic mobility (EPM), leading to inaccuracies when applied to polydisperse or heterogeneous populations. To address this lack of single-nanoparticle characterization, this work applies 3D Single-Molecule Active Real-time Tracking (3D-SMART) to simultaneously determine NP size and EPM on a per-particle basis. Single-nanoparticle EPM is determined by using active feedback to "lock on" to a single particle and apply an oscillating electric field along one axis. A maximum likelihood approach is applied to extract the single-particle EPM from the oscillating nanoparticle position along the field-actuated axis, while mean squared displacement is used along the non-actuated axes to determine size. Unfunctionalized and carboxyl-functionalized polystyrene NPs are found to have unique EPM based on their individual size and surface characteristics, and it is demonstrated that single-nanoparticle EPM is a more precise tool for distinguishing unique NP preparations than diffusion alone, able to determine the charge number of individual NPs to an uncertainty of less than 30. This method also explored individual nanoparticle EPM in various ionic strengths (0.25-5 mM) and found decreased EPM as a function of increasing ionic strength, in agreement with results determined via bulk characterization methods. Finally, it is demonstrated that the electric field can be manipulated in real time in response to particle position, resulting in one-dimensional electrokinetic trapping. Critically, this new single-nanoparticle EPM determination and trapping method does not require microfluidics, opening the possibility for the exploration of single-nanoparticle EPM in live tissue and more comprehensive characterization of nanoparticles in biologically relevant environments.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
Nanoscale Advances
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
7
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
9
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
12
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
18
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
23
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
25
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
26
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
29
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%