Back

Natural variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana root and shoot response to boron deficiency reveals sensitive and responsive phenes and phylogenetic and geographic clustering of boron efficiency adaptations

Alcock, T. D.; Bienert, M. D.; Junker, A.; Tschiersch, H.; Meyer, R. C.; Kudamala, S.; von Wiren, N.; Altmann, T.; Bienert, G. P.

2024-07-10 plant biology
10.1101/2024.07.08.602492 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIBoron (B) is an essential plant micronutrient with a crucial role in cell wall stability. To improve plant tolerance to suboptimal B-availability, it is crucial to understand the mechanisms plants have evolved to tolerate B-limited conditions. C_LIO_LIWe assessed temporal physiological, ionomic and molecular responses to B-deficiency across a diversity panel of 185 Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Plants were characterised in soil-substrate in an automated phenotyping system to track shoot performance, and on agar plates to track root traits. C_LIO_LIAccessions varied widely in their response to B-deficiency. Rosette area decreased by 50% under B-deficiency across all accessions on average but by less than 15% in B-efficient accessions alone. Most root traits suffered under B-deficiency but lateral root length increased in 20% of accessions. The B-uptake and B transporter expression response of B-efficient and B-inefficient accessions was similar, suggesting increased B-use rather than B-uptake efficiency in efficient accessions. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated enrichment of B-efficient accessions within a clade containing accessions originating from areas characterised as B-deficient. K-means clustering revealed increased lateral root length was associated with efficient shoot growth under B-deficiency. C_LIO_LIThe results demonstrate different response strategies to B-deficiency, indicating target traits to improve the performance of plants grown under B-limiting conditions. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.