Back

Identification of the Risk Factors for Complex-Multiple Long-term Conditions (C-MLTC): A Scoping Review

Heneghan, C.; ONAKPOYA, I.; Brassey, J.; Shepperd, J. P.; Tsiachristas, A.; Bhui, K.; Perera, R.; Bennett, D.

2024-08-12 public and global health
10.1101/2024.07.08.24310078 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundComplex multiple long-term conditions (C-MLTC) are commonly defined as the presence of four or more long-term conditions, and their prevalence is projected to increase significantly over the next decade. MethodsWe undertook a scoping review of the literature to identify available evidence on the risk factors for C-MLTC and map out the potential clusters. We focussed on a subset of 18 chronic conditions because they include the most commonly reported and prevalent conditions in the general population. For guidelines we searched NICE Clinical Knowledge Summaries (CKS) and for systematic reviews we searched PubMed, Google Scholar and the TRIP database. ResultsWe found 53 risk factors associated with 18 long-term conditions. Sixteen of these are linked to C-MLTC, with 11 being modifiable. Although we reviewed 51 systematic reviews, inconsistent reporting made it difficult to quantify the risk factors and conditions associated with C-MLTC. Diabetes mellitus was a risk factor for most other conditions (10), followed by coronary heart disease, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease (each associated with 8 long-term conditions). Additionally, depression and anxiety are commonly associated with other long-term conditions, with 19 and 20 conditions, respectively. ConclusionSeveral risks and conditions contribute to the development of multimorbidity. Anxiety and depression are nearly associated with all long-term conditions. Reporting problems within the existing evidence and a lack of clear definitions prevent adequate quantification of the risks related to C-MLTC.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.