Healthcare professionals' attitudes towards digital health interventions and perspectives on digital health inequalities: a qualitative study
Ramasawmy, M.; Sunkersing, D.; Poole, L.; Blandford, A.; Gill, P.; Khunti, K.; Modha, S.; Patel, K.; Potts, H. W. W.; Sajid, M.; Khan, N.; Banerjee, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundUse of Digital Health Interventions (DHIs) for the management of cardiometabolic diseases has increased, but may exacerbate existing health inequalities. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) play a vital role in recommending and supporting patients to use these tools. There is a need to understand the role of HCPs in managing the implementation of digital health in communities at risk of health inequalities. ObjectiveTo explore the views of health care professionals about digital health and its impact on health inequalities, focusing on cardiometabolic diseases and the South Asian population in the UK. MethodsOnline interviews and focus-groups with HCPs (n=18), exploring participants experiences and attitudes towards digital health, perceptions of patients barriers and facilitators to use, whether they perceived any populations to be particularly at risk of digital inequalities, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their practice in relation to digital health. After informed consent, transcription and coding, a reflexive thematic approach was taken to analysis. ResultsHCPs recognised the potential benefits of DHIs to improve access and delivery of care and patient outcomes, but described several barriers to successful implementation. HCPs demonstrated a good understanding of the challenges their patients face in relation to wider inequalities, barriers to health behaviours and healthcare access, and digital health. Of particular concern was the impact of increasing reliance of digital interventions in health care on the exclusion of some patient groups. Participants recommended improvement of the design and implementation of DHIs offered to patients through working with at-risk populations throughout the process. Finally, participants emphasised the importance of ensuring non-digital services remained available to ensure equitable access to health and social care. ConclusionsHCPs described the complexities of delivering care to underserved communities. DHIs were identified as a potential way to improve health outcomes for some, while over-reliance risked exacerbating inequalities. Participant recommendations related to design, implementation, and engaging target populations providing practical examples to address digital health inequalities, such as working with other sectors to take a community approach.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 97%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 94%
- Developing contents for a digital drug adherence tool with reminder cues and personalized feedback: a formative mixed-methods study among children and adolescents living with HIV in Tanzania 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 95%
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 95%
- “Endless Opportunities”: A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers to scale-up of two-way texting follow-up after voluntary medical male circumcision in Zimbabwe 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 93%
- “We tend to get pad happy” : a qualitative study of health practitioners’ perspectives on continence care for older people in hospital 92%
- An electronic application to improve management of infections in low-income neonatal units: pilot implementation of the NeoTree Beta App in a public sector hospital in Zimbabwe. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the first wave of COVID-19 on those with lifelong conditions: a case study of congenital heart disease 93%
- The public views of and reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic in England- a qualitative study with diverse ethnicities 93%
- Physician experiences of electronic health records interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: A cross-sectional survey study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 93%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 93%
- Understanding Covid-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.