Back

Accurate diagnosis achieved via super-resolution whole slide images by pathologists and artificial intelligence

wang, k.; LIU, R.; chen, Y.; wang, y.; qiu, y.; gao, y.; zhou, m.; bai, b.; zhang, m.; sun, k.; Deng, H.-W.; xiao, h.; Yu, G.

2024-07-07 pathology
10.1101/2024.07.05.24310022 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDigital pathology significantly improves diagnostic efficiency and accuracy; however, pathological tissue sections are scanned at high resolutions (HR), magnified by 40 times (40X) incurring high data volume, leading to storage bottlenecks for processing large numbers of whole slide images (WSIs) for later diagnosis in clinic and hospitals. MethodWe propose to scan at a magnification of 5 times (5X). We developed a novel multi-scale deep learning super-resolution (SR) model that can be used to accurately computes 40X SR WSIs from the 5X WSIs. ResultsThe required storage size for the resultant data volume of 5X WSIs is only one sixty-fourth (less than 2%) of that of 40X WSIs. For comparison, three pathologists used 40X scanned HR and 40X computed SR WSIs from the same 480 histology glass slides spanning 47 diseases (such tumors, inflammation, hyperplasia, abscess, tumor-like lesions) across 12 organ systems. The results are nearly perfectly consistent with each other, with Kappa values (HR and SR WSIs) of 0.988{+/-}0.018, 0.924{+/-}0.059, and 0.966{+/-}0.037, respectively, for the three pathologists. There were no significant differences in diagnoses of three pathologists between the HR and corresponding SR WSIs, with Area under the Curve (AUC): 0.920{+/-}0.164 vs. 0.921{+/-}0.158 (p-value=0.653), 0.931{+/-}0.128 vs. 0.943{+/-}0.121 (p-value=0.736), and 0.946{+/-}0.088 vs. 0.941{+/-}0.098 (p-value=0.198). A previously developed highly accurate colorectal cancer artificial intelligence system (AI) diagnosed 1,821 HR and 1,821 SR WSIs, with AUC values of 0.984{+/-}0.016 vs. 0.984{+/-}0.013 (p-value=0.810), again with nearly perfect matching results. ConclusionsThe pixel numbers of 5X WSIs is only less than 2% of that of 40X WSIs. The 40X computed SR WSIs can achieve accurate diagnosis comparable to 40X scanned HR WSIs, both by pathologists and AI. This study provides a promising solution to overcome a common storage bottleneck in digital pathology.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.6%
5
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
9
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
12
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
16
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
18
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
23
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
26
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
29
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
30
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%