Back

Investigating associations between physical multimorbidity clusters and subsequent depression: cluster and survival analysis of UK Biobank data

DeLong, L. N.; Fleetwood, K.; Prigge, R.; Galdi, P.; Guthrie, B.; Fleuriot, J. D.

2024-07-07 health informatics
10.1101/2024.07.05.24310004 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMultimorbidity, the co-occurrence of two or more conditions within an individual, is a growing challenge for health and care delivery as well as for research. Combinations of physical and mental health conditions are highlighted as particularly important. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between physical multimorbidity and subsequent depression. Methods and FindingsWe performed a clustering analysis upon physical morbidity data for UK Biobank participants aged 37-73 years at baseline data collection between 2006-2010. Of 502,353 participants, 142,005 had linked general practice data with at least one physical condition at baseline. Following stratification by sex (77,785 women; 64,220 men), we used four clustering methods (agglomerative hierarchical clustering, latent class analysis, k-medoids and k-modes) and selected the best-performing method based on clustering metrics. We used Fishers Exact test to determine significant over-/under-representation of conditions within each cluster. Amongst people with no prior depression, we used survival analysis to estimate associations between cluster-membership and time to subsequent depression diagnosis. The k-modes models consistently performed best, and the over-/under-represented conditions in the resultant clusters reflected known associations. For example, clusters containing an overrepresentation of cardiometabolic conditions were amongst the largest clusters in the whole cohort (15.5% of participants, 19.7% of women, 24.2% of men). Cluster associations with depression varied from hazard ratio (HR) 1.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-1.98) to HR 2.67 (95% CI 2.24-3.17), but almost all clusters showed a higher association with depression than those without physical conditions. ConclusionsWe found that certain groups of physical multimorbidity may be associated with a higher risk of subsequent depression. However, our findings invite further investigation into other factors, like social ones, which may link physical multimorbidity with depression.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.1%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
5
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
10
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
11
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
12
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
23
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%