Single-gene transcripts for subclinical TB: an individual participant data meta-analysis
Greenan-Barrett, J.; Mendelsohn, S. C.; Scriba, T. J.; Noursadeghi, M.; Gupta, R. K.
Show abstract
BackgroundTranslation of blood RNA signatures may be accelerated by identifying more parsimonious biomarkers. We tested the hypothesis that single-gene transcripts provide comparable accuracy for detection of subclinical TB to multi-gene signatures and benchmarked their clinical utility to interferon-y release assays (IGRAs). MethodsWe identified datasets where participants underwent RNA sampling and at least 12 months of follow-up for progression to TB. We performed a one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis to compare multi-gene signatures against single-gene transcripts to detect subclinical TB, defined as asymptomatic prevalent or incident TB (diagnosed [≥]21 days from enrolment, irrespective of symptoms) over a 12-month interval. We performed decision curve analysis to evaluate the net benefit of using RNA biomarkers and IGRA, alone or in combination, compared to treating all or no individuals with preventative treatment. ResultsWe evaluated 80 single-genes and eight multi-gene signatures in a pooled analysis of four RNAseq and three qPCR datasets, comprising 6544 total samples and including 283 samples from 214 individuals with subclinical TB. Five single-gene transcripts were equivalent to the best-performing multi-gene signature over 12 months, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves ranging from 0.75-0.77, but none met the WHO minimum target product profile (TPP) for a TB progression test. IGRA demonstrated much lower specificity in higher burden settings, while sensitivity and specificity of RNA biomarkers were consistent across settings. In higher burden settings, RNA biomarkers had greater net benefit than IGRA, which offered little clinical utility over treating all with preventative therapy. In low burden settings, IGRA approximated the TPP and offered greater clinical utility than RNA biomarkers, but combining both tests provided the highest net benefit for services aiming to treat <50 people to prevent a single case. InterpretationSingle-gene transcripts are equivalent to multi-gene signatures for detection of subclinical TB, with consistent performance across settings. Single transcripts demonstrate potential clinical utility to stratify treatment, particularly when used in combination with IGRA in low burden settings.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic accuracy of swab-based molecular tests for tuberculosis using novel near point-of-care platforms: A multi-country evaluation 93%
- Immune profiling of Mycobacterium tuberculosis -specific T cells in recent and remote infection 93%
- Characterising heterogeneity and sero-reversion in antibody responses to mild SARS⍰CoV-2 infection: a cohort study using time series analysis and mechanistic modelling 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Concise whole blood transcriptional signatures for incipient tuberculosis: A systematic review and patient-level pooled meta-analysis 98%
- The Natural History of Untreated Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 95%
- A randomised clinical trial of azithromycin versus standard care in ambulatory COVID-19 – the ATOMIC2 trial 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mortality of Drug-resistant Tuberculosis in High-burden Countries: Comparison of Routine Drug Susceptibility Testing with Whole-genome Sequencing 93%
- Nanopore sequencing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing and outbreak investigation 92%
- Deciphering Bedaquiline and Clofazimine Resistance in Tuberculosis: An Evolutionary Medicine Approach 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exhaled Mycobacterium tuberculosis predicts incident infection in household contacts 96%
- Household contact tracing with intensified tuberculosis and HIV screening in South Africa: a cluster randomised trial 93%
- Revisiting the Natural History of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: a Bayesian Estimation of Natural Recovery and Mortality rates 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.