Back

Female fruit flies use social cues to make egg clustering decisions

Churchill, E. R.; Fowler, E. K.; Friend, L. A.; Archetti, M.; Yu, D. W.; Bourke, A. F. G.; Chapman, T.; Bretman, A.

2024-07-05 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2024.07.03.600353 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe ability to respond plastically to environmental variation is a key determinant of fitness. Females may use cues to strategically place their eggs, for example adjusting the number or location of eggs according to whether other females are present, driving the dynamics of local competition or cooperation. The expression of plasticity in egg laying patterns within individual patches, i.e., in contact clusters or not, represents an additional, under-researched and potentially important opportunity for fitness gains. Clustered eggs might benefit from increased protection or defence, and clustering could facilitate cooperative feeding. However, increased clustering is also expected to increase the risk of over-exploitation through direct competition. These potential benefits and costs likely covary with the number of individuals present, hence egg clustering behaviour within resource patches should be socially responsive. We investigate this new topic using the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. ResultsOur mathematical model, parameterised by data, verified that females cluster their eggs non-randomly, and increase clustering as group size increases. We also showed that, as the density of adult females increased, females laid more eggs, laid them faster, and laid more eggs in clusters. Females also preferred to place eggs within existing clusters. Most egg clusters were of mixed maternity. ConclusionsCollectively, the results reveal that females actively express plasticity in egg clustering according to social environment cues and prefer to lay in clusters of mixed maternity, despite the potential for increased competition. These findings are consistent with egg clustering plasticity being selected due to public goods-related benefits.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.9%
2
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.1%
4
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
8
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
16
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
24
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%