Back

Optimizing multi-environment trials in the US Rice belt via smart-climate-soil prediction based-models and economic importance

Prado, M.; Famoso, A.; Guidry, K.; Fritsche-Neto, R.

2024-07-03 genetics
10.1101/2024.07.02.601777 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rice breeding programs globally have worked to release increasingly productive and climate-smart cultivars, but the genetic gains have been limited for some reasons. One is the capacity for field phenotyping, which presents elevated costs and an unclear approach to defining the number and allocation of multi-environmental trials (MET). To address this challenge, we used soil information and ten years of historical weather data from the USA rice belt, which was translated into rice response based on the rice cardinal temperatures and crop stages. Next, we eliminated those highly correlated Environmental Covariates (ECs) (>0.95) and applied a supervised algorithm for feature selection using two years of data (2021-22) and 25 genotypes evaluated for grain yield in 18 representative locations in the Southern USA. To test the trials optimization, we performed the joint analysis using prediction-based models in four different scenarios: I) considering trials as non-related, ii) including the environmental relationship matrix calculated from ECs, iii) within clusters; iv) sampling one location per cluster. Finally, we weigh the trials allocation considering the counties economic importance and the environmental group to which they belong. Our findings show that eight ECs explained 58% of grain yield variation across sites and 53% of the observed GxE. Moreover, it is possible to reduce 28% the number of locations without significant loss in accuracy. Furthermore, the US Rice belt comprises four clusters, with economic importance varying from 13 to 45%. These results will help us better allocate trials in advance and reduce costs without penalizing accuracy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.2%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.7%
7
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
12
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
18
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
20
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%