Bridging the Gap in Health Literacy: Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models to Generate Plain Language Summaries from Biomedical Texts
Salazar-Lara, C.; Arias Russi, A. F.; Manrique, R.
Show abstract
Health literacy is essential for individuals to navigate the healthcare system and make informed decisions about their health. Low health literacy levels have been associated with negative health outcomes, particularly among older populations and those financially restricted or with lower educational attainment. Plain language summaries (PLS) are an effective tool to bridge the gap in health literacy by simplifying content found in biomedical and clinical documents, in turn, allowing the general audience to truly understand health-related documentation. However, translating biomedical texts to PLS is time-consuming and challenging, for which they are rarely accessible by those who need them. We assessed the performance of Natural Language Processing (NLP) for systematizing plain language identification and Large Language Models (LLMs), Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) 3.5 and GPT 4, for automating PLS generation from biomedical texts. The classification model achieved high precision (97{middle dot}2%) in identifying if a text is written in plain language. GPT 4, a state-of-the-art LLM, successfully generated PLS that were semantically equivalent to those generated by domain experts and which were rated high in accuracy, readability, completeness, and usefulness. Our findings demonstrate the value of using LLMs and NLP to translate biomedical texts into plain language summaries, and their potential to be used as a supporting tool for healthcare stakeholders to empower patients and the general audience to understand healthcare information and make informed healthcare decisions.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 94%
- Structured Codes and Free-Text Notes: Measuring Information Complementarity in Electronic Health Records 92%
- Understanding how the design and implementation of Online Consultations influence primary care outcomes: Systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of SURUS: a Named Entity Recognition System to Extract Knowledge from Interventional Study Records 95%
- Investigator-initiated versus industry-sponsored trials – Visibility and relevance of randomized controlled trials in clinical practice guidelines (IMPACT) 94%
- Development, validation, and usage of metrics to evaluate clinical research hypothesis quality 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.