Back

Bridging the Gap in Health Literacy: Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models to Generate Plain Language Summaries from Biomedical Texts

Salazar-Lara, C.; Arias Russi, A. F.; Manrique, R.

2024-07-03 health informatics
10.1101/2024.07.02.24309847 medRxiv
Show abstract

Health literacy is essential for individuals to navigate the healthcare system and make informed decisions about their health. Low health literacy levels have been associated with negative health outcomes, particularly among older populations and those financially restricted or with lower educational attainment. Plain language summaries (PLS) are an effective tool to bridge the gap in health literacy by simplifying content found in biomedical and clinical documents, in turn, allowing the general audience to truly understand health-related documentation. However, translating biomedical texts to PLS is time-consuming and challenging, for which they are rarely accessible by those who need them. We assessed the performance of Natural Language Processing (NLP) for systematizing plain language identification and Large Language Models (LLMs), Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) 3.5 and GPT 4, for automating PLS generation from biomedical texts. The classification model achieved high precision (97{middle dot}2%) in identifying if a text is written in plain language. GPT 4, a state-of-the-art LLM, successfully generated PLS that were semantically equivalent to those generated by domain experts and which were rated high in accuracy, readability, completeness, and usefulness. Our findings demonstrate the value of using LLMs and NLP to translate biomedical texts into plain language summaries, and their potential to be used as a supporting tool for healthcare stakeholders to empower patients and the general audience to understand healthcare information and make informed healthcare decisions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.8%
2
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.1%
3
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.1%
5
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
7
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
10
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.6%
11
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
12
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
13
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
14
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
18
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
20
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.6%